2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0971-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of subfossil Daphnia and Chaoborus assemblages in relation to progressive acidification and fish community alterations in SW Sweden

Abstract: Dated sediment cores from acidified and fishless Lake Gaffeln and Lake Härsvatten, SW Sweden, were analyzed for Daphnia ephippia and Chaoborus mandibles to test whether acidification history and fish extirpations could be reconstructed in a paleo-study using these easily identifiable animal remains. According to monitoring data fish were lost in both lakes from the 1950s to the 1970s. Progressive acidification prior to monitoring was confirmed by a gradual decrease and eventual loss of Daphnia ephippia in both… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Below this, Chaoborus mandibles exceed 3% only once. Mandible concentrations are low with a maximum of only 6 individuals/cm , which is comparable to concentrations at some sites (Uutala 1990), but orders of magnitude less than at others (Palm et al 2012;Tolonen et al 2012). Mandibles in most samples are either Chaoborus flavicans or C. trivittatus.…”
Section: Chironomid Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Below this, Chaoborus mandibles exceed 3% only once. Mandible concentrations are low with a maximum of only 6 individuals/cm , which is comparable to concentrations at some sites (Uutala 1990), but orders of magnitude less than at others (Palm et al 2012;Tolonen et al 2012). Mandibles in most samples are either Chaoborus flavicans or C. trivittatus.…”
Section: Chironomid Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The sedimentary remains of Chaoborus species have been used in paleolimnological studies as a proxy for fish presence (e.g. Uutala 1990;Lamontagne and Schindler 1994;Uutala and Smol 1996;Palm et al 2012) and even fish biomass and population density (Tolonen et al 2012). The basis for this approach centers on whether Chaoborus species are capable of diurnal migration to avoid predation by fish, which is the case in C. flavicans and C. trivittatus (Uutala 1990).…”
Section: Chaoborus As a Proxy For Fish Presencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…are a type of a midge whose larvae (~6-23 mm) can live up to several months in anoxic sediments of small ponds. They are found on all continents excluding Antarctica, particularly in temperate and tropical climates and under eutrophic conditions [259][260][261][262] and prefer environments with standing water [263]. They prey on cladocerans, copepods and rotifers, preferring the smallest available prey [264].…”
Section: Chaoborus Sppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical presence of fish in Cunswick Tarn was determined by identification of chaoborid larval mandibles using the cladoceran method. Chaoborus obscuripes and Chaoborus crystallinus are non-migratory species associated with fishless lakes (Luoto and Nevalainen, 2009;Palm et al, 2012;Tolonen et al, 2012) and therefore their consistent presence in the core record was interpreted as a proxy for fishlessness. Mandibles were identified using Aitken (1954), Uutala (1990), Živić and Marković (2006), and Palm et al (2011).…”
Section: Biological Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%