2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-018-0204-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of surrogate model using CFD and deep neural networks to optimize gas detector layout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step 3: Fitness selection. Generate random probability P. The adaptive selection probability P 0 based on hormone regulation is set by Equation (10). Several individuals are selected in the random population.…”
Section: Inverse Positioning Methods Based On Improved Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Step 3: Fitness selection. Generate random probability P. The adaptive selection probability P 0 based on hormone regulation is set by Equation (10). Several individuals are selected in the random population.…”
Section: Inverse Positioning Methods Based On Improved Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forconi, E et al proposed an optimal placement of sensors based on the leakage risk that was able to make the detection of large leaks more efficient [9]. Based on a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of potential leakage risks, Jeon, K et al presented a method to avoid insufficient sampling while reducing the computational load for gas detector allocation optimization [10]. Dong, JK et al divided the monitoring area into a uniform grid and calculated the risk information value of each grid node to determine the sensor layout and priority order [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surrogate models, once trained, offer a lower computational overhead in evaluating a design space. See, for example, (Hanna et al, 2020;Jeon et al, 2019). While they offer long-term computational sustainability, they all require extensive evaluation of the design space to train the model.…”
Section: Existing Methods To Reduce Computational Effortmentioning
confidence: 99%