Food limitation may be one of the causes of declines in northern fur seal populations on the Pribilof Islands. This hypothesis could be tested by comparing foraging behavior from decreasing Pribilof fur seal populations and an increasing population, such as on the Lovushki Islands, Russia, but factors other than prey availability that differ between sites may also influence behavior. Therefore, we evaluated such factors, including lunar cycle, weather, seal body size, and size of recording instruments, by studying 41 lactating northern fur seals on Lovushki Island over 4 summer breeding seasons using instrument packages of various sizes. With greater moonlight, seals increased foraging trip duration, dive depth, dive duration, and time spent on the bottom of dives but decreased descent rate and diving bout duration. Larger females made shorter shore visits, spent a greater proportion of time at sea diving, and had longer dive bouts than smaller females. Tags with larger frontal surface areas and higher drag caused seals to dive longer and to descend and ascend faster during dives but did not affect foraging trip durations or mass change rates. Seals, therefore, appeared capable of compensating for instrument effects on the scale of indi vidual dives. Although lactating seals from Lovushki Island appeared to spend less foraging effort than seals from the Pribilofs, future studies should control for methodological factors and local environmental conditions before concluding whether food limitation could explain differences in population trajectories.
KEY WORDS: Pinniped · Diving behavior · Device effects · Lunar · Biotelemetry · Tags
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 471: [293][294][295][296][297][298][299][300][301][302][303][304][305][306][307][308] 2012 group along the Kuril Island chain in the western Pacific Ocean (Fig. 1), fur seal populations have been growing. Northern fur seal pup production at Lovushki is currently increasing annually by 3.8% based on count surveys conducted in (Burkanov et al. 2007. Although the factors potentially influencing these populations are difficult to study directly, they could be evaluated indirectly using fur seal foraging behavior as an indicator of prey availability (Boyd et al. 1994, Arnould et al. 1996, Costa 2007.Lactating females of many fur seal species change their behavior in response to changes in their prey (Trillmich 1990). In years of reduced prey availability, Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella increased foraging trip duration (Costa et al. 1989). Seasonal declines in prey caused subantarctic fur seals A. tropicalis from Amsterdam Island to increase their proportion of time at sea spent diving and foraging trip duration (Beauplet et al. 2004). In contrast, northern fur seals increased their energy expenditure and increased their proportion of time at sea spent diving to maintain constant foraging trip durations during 2 different years with (presumably) contrasting prey availabil...