2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.08.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the alopecia areata scale for clinical use: Results of an academic–industry collaborative effort

Abstract: Background:The current classification for alopecia areata (AA) does not provide a consistent assessment of disease severity.Objective: To develop an AA severity scale based on expert experience.Methods: A modified Delphi process was utilized. An advisory group of 22 AA clinical experts from the United States was formed to develop this AA scale. Representatives from the pharmaceutical industry provided feedback during its development.Results: Survey responses were used to draft severity criteria, aspiring to de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Brazilian AA consensus proposes evaluating severity with the following scale: mild AA: 20% or less scalp hair loss; moderate AA 21–49% scalp hair loss; and severe AA 50–100% scalp hair loss [ 52 ]. A mild or moderate severity rating increases to the next level if any of the following are present: negative impact on psychosocial functioning, noticeable involvement of eyebrows or eyelashes, inadequate response after 6 months of treatment, diffuse (multifocal) positive hair pull test consistent with rapidly progressive AA [ 52 ]. Implementing this severity scale could provide substantial benefits for treatment decisions and disease monitoring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Brazilian AA consensus proposes evaluating severity with the following scale: mild AA: 20% or less scalp hair loss; moderate AA 21–49% scalp hair loss; and severe AA 50–100% scalp hair loss [ 52 ]. A mild or moderate severity rating increases to the next level if any of the following are present: negative impact on psychosocial functioning, noticeable involvement of eyebrows or eyelashes, inadequate response after 6 months of treatment, diffuse (multifocal) positive hair pull test consistent with rapidly progressive AA [ 52 ]. Implementing this severity scale could provide substantial benefits for treatment decisions and disease monitoring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since reviews have failed to identify a therapy supported by robust evidence, treatments are based on expert opinion or consensus [ 2 ]. This might soon change, given several ongoing clinical trials evaluating different therapies, including biologics and small molecules [ 52 , 54 57 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, there is increasing awareness that a classical, autoantigen-and CD8+ T cell-dependent autoimmune variant of AA (AAA) and a possibly autoantigenindependent non-autoimmune variant (NAIAA) may have to be distinguished from each other (Gilhar et al, 2019a;Bertolini et al, 2020;Paus et al, 2020). This is in line with the long-standing, but often under-appreciated clinical recognition that AA shows a wide spectrum of phenotypes and sub-forms Ikeda et al, 1965;Meah et al, 2021;King et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The patient had a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score of 100, 11 or severe alopecia per the new alopecia severity assessment. 12 She noted that she had previously received treatment for her AA over a decade earlier with topical steroids, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide, methotrexate, and diphenylcyclopropenone with no benefit but had not been on any treatment in recent years. The patient was on no medications.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%