2001
DOI: 10.3847/aer2001004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
41
1
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
41
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not all topics included in the Introductory Astronomy Survey (CAER, 1999;Hufnagel, 2002) were covered in the workshops, it was used as the pre/post instrument. It includes 21 content items and one rating of self-confidence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not all topics included in the Introductory Astronomy Survey (CAER, 1999;Hufnagel, 2002) were covered in the workshops, it was used as the pre/post instrument. It includes 21 content items and one rating of self-confidence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deming (2002) provided more details about the use of the ADT 2.0 that were lacking in previous studies that used the ADT 2.0, such as Hufnagel et al (2000) and Hufnagel (2002). The ADT 2.0 National Project was conducted in order to address reliability and validity of the instrument.…”
Section: Instrument Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time will tell if this will be a true paradigm shift in the assessment of lunar phase education, or if it will be simply an addition to established quantitative assessment tools that were already in use. Hufnagel et al (2000) and Hufnagel (2002) describe the development of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test 2.0 (ADT 2.0). Hufnagel et al (2000) provides much more details into the development of the ADT 2.0 but Hufnagel (2002) provides more insight into the evolution of individual questions from version 1.0 to version 2.0 and Hufnagel (2002) was written when more data was available.…”
Section: Instrument Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations