Development of the Coaching Issues Survey (CIS)

Kelley, Betty C.; Baghurst, Timothy

doi:10.1123/tsp.23.3.367

Cited by 13 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These findings are significant because of the impact stress has on both physical and mental processes of individuals, which can negatively influence health, productivity, and quality of work over time (DeLongis, Coyne, Dakof, Folkman, & Lazarus, 1982;Kanner, Coyne, Schaefer, & Lazarus, 1981). Burnout occurring in coaches is a real possibility (Kelley & Baghurst, 2009;Kelley, Eklund, & Ritter-Taylor, 1999), and a consequence that should not be ignored.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coaching Stressors in a Division II Historically Black University

Robbins

Gilbert

Clifton

2015

Journal of Intercollegiate Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to further the research by studying coaches at a Historically Black College/University (HBCU) and Division II (DII) athletic program. Participants included seven head and five assistant coaches across seven sports. All coaches were interviewed, based on a preexisting interview guide (Olusoga et al., 2009). Data were content analyzed using previously agreed upon procedures and submitted in NVivo for further examination (Côté, Salmela, Baria, & Russell, 1993). Three higher order themes termed Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, and Contextual Stressors emerged and were composed of 16 lower order themes. The most commonly cited interpersonal stressors included athletes, expectations of others, and administration. Performance outcome and lack of control were the most common intrapersonal stressors. Finally, schedule, lack of resources, and job security were the most common contextual stressors. These findings emphasize the stressful nature of the job and the need to identify means for minimizing stressors to improve the athletic experience for all involved.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coaching Stressors in a Division II Historically Black University

Robbins

Gilbert

Clifton

2015

Journal of Intercollegiate Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ten of the 24 papers that examined stressors with sports coaches used quantitative methods. The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983) was used in six of these studies (Georgios & Nikolaos, 2012;Kelley, Eklund, & Ritter-Taylor, 1999;Knight, Reade, Selzler, & Rodgers, 2013;Malinauskas, Malinauskiene, & Dumciene, 2010;Nikolaos, 2012;Tashman et al, 2010), the Coaching Issue Survey (Kelley & Baghurst, 2009) was deployed in two studies (Kelley, 1994;Kelley et al, 1999) Quantitative research has highlighted that coaches encounter a variety of stressors (e.g., lack of social support, role based and task based responsibilities, level of coaching, demographics, salary, contract, working hours, competition, and perfectionism) that are significantly associated with increased perceived stress among coaches (Hudson et al, 2013;Judge et al, 2015;Kellman, & Kallus, 1994;Knight et al, 2013;Tashman et al, 2010). The research also highlights that the stressors encountered may differ between genders.…”

Section: Stressorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stressors, coping, and well-being among sports coaches: A systematic review

Norris

Didymus

Kaiseler

2017

Psychology of Sport and Exercise

124

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Sports coaching can be an inherently stressful occupation because coaches must fulfill multiple roles and cope with various expectations. Further, stress and well-being have implications for coach performance. The objective of this study was, therefore, to conduct a systematic review of literature on stressors, coping, and well-being among sports coaches. Design: A systematic review using PRIMSA guidelines. Method: Thorough and systematic literature searches of PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were conducted. To be eligible for inclusion, papers had to be published in the English language between January 1994 and March 2016 and as full papers in peer-reviewed journals. Results: The final sample consisted of 38 studies that were conducted with 4,188 sports coaches. This sample consisted of 19 qualitative, 17 quantitative, and two mixed methods studies. The findings demonstrate that coaches experience a variety of stressors relating to their performance and that of the athletes they work with in addition to organizational, contextual, interpersonal, and intrapersonal stressors. The findings also highlight that coaches use a variety of coping strategies (e.g., problem solving, social support, escaping the stressful environment) to reduce the negative outcomes of stress. Five studies that were included in this review focused on coaches' well-being and found that basic psychological needs satisfaction, lack of basic psychological needs thwarting, and self-determined motivation are needed for coaches to be psychologically well. Conclusion: Future research should address gaps in extant literature by using longitudinal study designs to explore coaches' appraisals of stressors, coping effectiveness, social support, and well-being among the unique sports coaching population.

show abstract

“…Following Lazarus's (1999) transactional model of stress and coping, several authors assume that burnout can occur as one negative outcome of prolonged stress associated with the interaction of personal and environmental factors (Smith, 1986; Kelley and Baghurst, 2009), which is resulting in a continuous imbalance between chronic stress and appropriate coping resources (Kelley and Gill, 1993; Smith, 2007). In this context, Kellmann (2002) has introduced the ‘scissor model’ of the interrelation between stress states and recovery demands.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Risk Detection of Burnout: Development of the Burnout Prevention Questionnaire for Coaches

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Previous research has shown that burnout develops as the result of a continuous imbalance between chronic stress and appropriate coping resources. Hence, the essential factors to measure burnout encompassed the factors stress and recovery within our studies. However, the Burnout Prevention Questionnaire for Coaches (BPQ-C) does not represent a new questionnaire from scratch, but rather a re-evaluated, condensed, and subsequently combined instrument with scales derived from validated psychometric instruments. Methods: The objective of study 1 ( N = 233) was to create and evaluate the psychometric structure of the BPQ-C. The aim of study 2 ( N = 473) consisted in the validation of the BPQ-C via a Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Results: The Exploratory Factor Analysis resulted in a model with three dimensions (Pre-Burnout, Resources, and Burnout). Via the subsequent Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the model could be confirmed with good fit indices (χ2 = 96.898, df = 19, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.973, SRMR = 0.044, RMSEA = 0.093, LO90 = 0.075, HI90 = 0.112). Conclusion: The BPQ-C includes a number of previously established risk and protective factors within a single psychometric instrument. The systematic application of the BPQ-C can help to detect critical conditions at an early stage in order to derive individualized and beneficial interventions for the respective coaches.

show abstract

Development of the Coaching Issues Survey (CIS)

Cited by 13 publications

References 26 publications

Coaching Stressors in a Division II Historically Black University

Coaching Stressors in a Division II Historically Black University

Stressors, coping, and well-being among sports coaches: A systematic review

Early Risk Detection of Burnout: Development of the Burnout Prevention Questionnaire for Coaches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About