2003
DOI: 10.1093/ptr/kpg019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the Cognitive Therapy Adherence and Competence Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
154
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
154
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be achieved by breaking down the global evaluations of therapist competence used here to more finely grained operationalizations of all the main dimensions of therapist competence [e.g. [28]], and by using aggregated ratings of clients’ perceptions of therapists’ competence across the full course of therapy. Moreover, to some degree, therapist competence changes over time and varies across patients [e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be achieved by breaking down the global evaluations of therapist competence used here to more finely grained operationalizations of all the main dimensions of therapist competence [e.g. [28]], and by using aggregated ratings of clients’ perceptions of therapists’ competence across the full course of therapy. Moreover, to some degree, therapist competence changes over time and varies across patients [e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive Therapy Adherence-Competence Scale (CTACS; Barber, Liese, & Abrams, 2003;Liese, Barber, & Beck, 1995). The 21-item CTACS is a new scale developed for this project that was derived from the Cognitive Therapy Scale (Young & Beck, 1980).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because adherence to specific techniques does not necessarily ensure that the treatment was delivered appropriately, the NIDA CCTS implemented therapist competence scales to allow for the assessment of how skillfully the techniques were implemented (Barber, Liese, & Abrams, 2003;Barber, Krakauer, Calvo, Badgio, & Faude, 1997;Barber, Mercer, Krakauer, & Calvo, 1996). The NIDA CCTS represents the first major clinical trial in which, in addition to adherence ratings, competence scales rated by independent judges have been implemented for all of the individual treatment conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherence and competence have been assessed for different forms of therapies simultaneously, including supportive expressive therapy , CT for depression (Barber, Liese, & Abrams, 2003), individual drug counseling (Barber, Mercer, Krakauer, & Calvo, 1996), dynamic therapy (Barber et al, 2004;Barber, Krakauer, Calvo, Badgio, & Faude, 1997), and PE (Schnurr et al, 2005(Schnurr et al, , 2007. In the scales developed by Carroll et al (2000), , and Barber et al (1997Barber et al ( , 2003Barber et al ( , 2004, raters are asked to assess the extent to which a technique was delivered (adherence) on a 5-or 7-point Likert scale, and how well it was done (competence), thus enabling separate reporting of adherence and competence as continuous variables.…”
Section: S S U E S I N T H E M E a S U R E M E N T O F A D H E R E mentioning
confidence: 99%