2020
DOI: 10.1002/navi.344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the dual‐frequency dual‐constellation airborne multipath models

Abstract: This paper presents a methodology to build multipath models for aviation use of new Global Positioning System (GPS) and Galileo signals. The estimation of airframe multipath errors makes use of carrier phase measurements; thus, it is affected by the integer ambiguities. A new method for removing the ambiguities from the multipath estimation is presented. The method is suitable for measurements from flight data and is able to exclude measurements highly affected by multipath from the estimation by using a deriv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antennas were evaluated in terms of C/ (i.e., carrier-to-noise ratio, directly affected by the gain characteristics of the antenna) and 100 s smoothed multipath and noise errors over elevation (calculated through dual-frequency code-minus-carrier methods [ 54 ]). The smoothing is used to reduce the high-frequency noise, allowing a better comparison between the different antennas.…”
Section: Exemplary Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antennas were evaluated in terms of C/ (i.e., carrier-to-noise ratio, directly affected by the gain characteristics of the antenna) and 100 s smoothed multipath and noise errors over elevation (calculated through dual-frequency code-minus-carrier methods [ 54 ]). The smoothing is used to reduce the high-frequency noise, allowing a better comparison between the different antennas.…”
Section: Exemplary Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different commercial antennas were measured at DLR and it has been observed that the errors are different for each antenna. For the derivation of the initial AGDV models, the antenna chosen to analyze was the one that had the largest group delay variations for both frequency bands in order to be representative of a minimally MOPS-compliant commercial antenna and provide conservative values at both bands and in the Ifree combination [6]. The same measurements presented in [6] are used in this study.…”
Section: Agdv Error Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the Dual Frequency Multipath Model for Aviation (DUFMAN) project funded by European Commission, dual-frequency, dual-constellation (DFDC) airborne multipath models were developed by collecting GPS and Galileo measurements from several test flights using aviation GNSS antenna and receivers [6], [7]. The multipath error models were derived by characterizing the errors introduced by the user antenna biases for the antennas used during the flights and separating their contribution from the observed multipath errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this methodology only applies if the Itest J k distribution is Gaussian. In the case the probability distribution computed with the Itest J k per bin presents a non Gaussian behaviour, we calculate a Gaussian overbound of the tails of the Itest J k distribution per bin following the approach in [16], [17]. Therefore, the detection threshold for station k is defined as:…”
Section: A Derivation Of the Monitoring Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%