2012
DOI: 10.3171/2012.6.aospine1258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia

Abstract: Object Primary outcome measures for the upper limb in trials concerning human spinal cord injury (SCI) need to distinguish between functional and neurological changes and require satisfying psychometric properties for clinical application. Methods The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) was developed by the International GRASSP Research and Design Team as a clinic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It provides complementary information to measures of activities of daily living (ADL). 11,12 Although the latter describe impairments of specific functions, they do not reveal the underlying innervation and principal kind of grasp. 12,13 Also knowledge of the strength of ISNCSCI upper extremity key muscle function does not reveal how the individual is able to use the hand-forearmproximal arm in complex movements.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It provides complementary information to measures of activities of daily living (ADL). 11,12 Although the latter describe impairments of specific functions, they do not reveal the underlying innervation and principal kind of grasp. 12,13 Also knowledge of the strength of ISNCSCI upper extremity key muscle function does not reveal how the individual is able to use the hand-forearmproximal arm in complex movements.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Although the latter describe impairments of specific functions, they do not reveal the underlying innervation and principal kind of grasp. 12,13 Also knowledge of the strength of ISNCSCI upper extremity key muscle function does not reveal how the individual is able to use the hand-forearmproximal arm in complex movements. 14,15 The five levels of hand function integrate the innervation of upper extremity muscles required to perform hand movements (like grasping and holding objects in the hand, manipulation (pro/ supination) and placement) and depend on sufficient voluntary innervation.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) protocol 21 for upper extremity motor score (UEMS), light touch (UELT) and pinprick (UEPP), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), 22 and the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, and Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) 23 were used as complementary assessments.…”
Section: Clinical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CUE is a self-reporting questionnaire in which patients rate their abilities to perform functional tasks with their arms; the THAQ focuses on activities that are important to persons with SCI, 15 but has limited clinical application being reported. 14 The recently developed GRASSP is a very promising instrument, designed to track the extent of spontaneous recovery or possible outcomes of a surgical or pharmacological intervention 16,17 and combines the evaluation of the impairment level with the evaluation of prehension. In contrast to the VLT, the GRASPP does not include information on the arm performance and it cannot be used as both an assessment tool and therapy guideline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%