2021
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the health behaviour scale for cancer patients (HBSCP), analysis of its factorial structure and evaluation of its psychometric properties

Abstract: Health behaviour has been associated with the incidence and mortality of various cancers (Kerr et al., 2017). Due to the importance of lifestyle behaviours in both preventing cancer and in improving recovery and survival, more attention has been given to assessing the health behaviour of cancer patients and survivors (Mayer et al., 2007) and in promoting healthy lifestyle behaviours (Doyle et al., 2006). In the following, we present studies on health behaviour that have been found to be associated with cancer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The few instrument development studies in which MD-omega was computed either do not report MD-omega total or values for all factors [ 46 , 47 ]. The overall internal consistency of the new HBS-16 as measured by Cronbach’s alpha, was very good and similar to other health behaviour measures [ 23 , 27 , 29 ]. Moreover, the coefficients for four factors of HBS-16 were much higher (0.68–0.76) than those of the HBI measure most frequently used in Poland (0.60–0.65) [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The few instrument development studies in which MD-omega was computed either do not report MD-omega total or values for all factors [ 46 , 47 ]. The overall internal consistency of the new HBS-16 as measured by Cronbach’s alpha, was very good and similar to other health behaviour measures [ 23 , 27 , 29 ]. Moreover, the coefficients for four factors of HBS-16 were much higher (0.68–0.76) than those of the HBI measure most frequently used in Poland (0.60–0.65) [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…To generate the initial item pool for the questionnaire, we reviewed literature pertaining to: the existing health behaviours scales to check what kind of items they contained and how robust the evidence supporting the items was [ 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]; the current definitions of health behaviours to see if they had any areas or domains not reflected in the existing scales [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]; the influence of health behaviours on such populations as women and persons with CVD to look for behaviours which need special attention [ 10 , 11 , 16 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation