1972
DOI: 10.21236/ad0757760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the Navy Human Relations Questionnaire

Abstract: Security Classification DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA-R&D ^Security classification ot title, body of abstract and indeicing annotation must be entered when tile overall report is classified)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The instrument included questions related to possible informatives or communicatives, such as religiofi, ethnicity, race, income and education of self and parents, occupations of parents, place and region of origin, political preference, recreational preference, and marital status. Attitudes were measured using Likert-type scales for which norms had already been reported, and which were salient to the apprentices'situation in the Navy (Robinson, Thanasiou, & Head, 1969;Robinson, Rusk, & Head, 1972;Robinson, & Shaver, 1969;Stoloff et al, 1973;Thornton, Hamilton, & Nealey, 1973). Withey's (1965) "Dimensions of Values" scales were among those used in the assessment.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The instrument included questions related to possible informatives or communicatives, such as religiofi, ethnicity, race, income and education of self and parents, occupations of parents, place and region of origin, political preference, recreational preference, and marital status. Attitudes were measured using Likert-type scales for which norms had already been reported, and which were salient to the apprentices'situation in the Navy (Robinson, Thanasiou, & Head, 1969;Robinson, Rusk, & Head, 1972;Robinson, & Shaver, 1969;Stoloff et al, 1973;Thornton, Hamilton, & Nealey, 1973). Withey's (1965) "Dimensions of Values" scales were among those used in the assessment.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Race relations and satisfaction-with-the-Navy scales were utilized from Stoloff et al (1973), and items were adapted from Thornton et al (1973) for scales related to satisfaction with training. Individual items were included measuring attitudes toward Navy rules and regulations, the importance of primary groups to the respondent, conflict in training units, perception of cliques within the respondent's unit, and a few other particular aspects of recruit training.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three instruments servef as the primary sources of an item pool for the development of an instrument consistent with the desired rationales: the original Racial Perceptions Inventory (Borus , Fi man , Stanton , & Doud , n .d. ), the Na vy Human f~~lations Questionnaire (CNA ) ( Stoloff , 1972), and the Enlisted Personnel Questionnaire on Race Relations in the Army (E PQ ) (Nordlie & Thomas, 1974) used in previous ARt research.…”
Section: Development Of the Rapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The military has been most notable in its consistent attention to the measurement of racism and racial climate, particularly during the 1970s. During that period, four instruments were developed to measure racism, discrimination, racial attitudes, and backlash racial attitudes (Borus, Stanton, & Doud, 1972;Hiett, McBride, & Fiman, 1978;Nordlie & Thomas, 1974;Stoloff, Lockman, Allbritton, & McKinley, 1972). The most recent instrument, the Racial Attitudes and Perceptions Survey (Hiett et al, 1978), combined many of the items from the earlier three instruments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%