Development of the<scp>K</scp>nee<scp>OA P</scp>re‐<scp>S</scp>creening<scp>Q</scp>uestionnaire

Yázigi, Flávia; Carnide, Filomena; Espanha, Margarida; Sousa, Miguel

doi:10.1111/1756-185x.12447

Cited by 5 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Yazigi et al [25], a self-reported questionnaire has to be user-friendly and should not contain too many questions and questions should be simple and clear. The reported questionnaire fulfills these criteria.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Five Questions to Identify Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Springer

Bechler

Waldstein

et al. 2020

The Journal of Arthroplasty

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This questionnaire reached a 94.5% sensitivity and 43.8% specificity. Some published questionnaires are limited to a specific race/ethnicity [25,27,28]. However, in contrast to our questionnaire, all questionnaires/scores require supervision by trained medical staff.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Five Questions to Identify Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Springer

Bechler

Waldstein

et al. 2020

The Journal of Arthroplasty

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Thus, the Knee OA Pre-Screening Questionnaire (KOPS) for knee OA screening without imaging exams was developed by Yázigi et al [6]. KOPS is a self-reported and self-filled questionnaire structured based on an extensive literature review, especially on the ACR and EULAR criteria for knee OA diagnosis [5,7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The KOPS followed the validation process of the screening questionnaires [8,9], as well as the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores [10] and the Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) [11]. The KOPS items were critically discussed by experts consisting of rheumatologists, physiotherapists, epidemiologists, and specialists in physical exercise and health [6]. The validity and accuracy of this instrument have been demonstrated for the Portugal population [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knee osteoarthritis pre-screening questionnaire (KOPS): cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the brazilian version—KOPS Brazilian version

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Despite the criteria already established for the classification of knee osteoarthritis (OA), a radiographic and/or clinical knee OA diagnosis usually occurs in cases of fully manifest or more advanced disease, which can make health promotion, prevention, and functional rehabilitation in more advanced stages of the disease less effective. In addition, radiographic knee OA can generate more financial costs for health services. Therefore, developing and validating screening instruments to assess the probability of development and progression of knee OA would be of great value for both clinical practice and science. Objective To cross-culturally adapt and investigate the measurement properties of the Knee OA Pre-screening Questionnaire Brazilian version. Methods A total of 250 individuals of both sexes aged between 35 and 92 years [(mean (standard deviation): 63 (11) years old; 74.1 (15.1) kg; 1.59 (0.09) m; 29.38 (5.44) kg/m2] participated in this study. The cross-cultural adaptation and analyses of the measurement properties of the KOPS Brazilian version included: (1) assessment of conceptual and item equivalence; (2) assessment of semantic equivalence; (3) assessment of operational equivalence; and (4) assessment of measurement equivalence, reliability, and validity. Results Cronbach’s alpha for the internal consistency among the six components of the KOPS Brazilian version was 0.71. The test-retest 72 h apart for each component resulted in a coefficient correlation intraclass ranging from 0.74 to 1.00. The probability of an individual randomly chosen from the population having KL ≥ 1 and KOPS Brazilian version ≥ 21 points was 0.74 (area under the curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic – AUC of ROC); furthermore, the AUC for KL ≥ 2 and the KOPS Brazilian version ≥ 23 points was 0.77. Conclusion The KOPS Brazilian version is a reliable and valid instrument for early screening of knee OA in individuals aged 35 years and over in the Brazilian context.

show abstract

“…A recent systematic review identified nine instruments that have been included in self-completion or interviewer-led questionnaires to determine the prevalence of knee OA or symptoms suspicious of OA (Yoong, 2018). These include: pharmacist identification of new diagnostically confirmed osteoarthritis (PHIND-OA) (Marra et al, 2007), the knee pain screening Tool (Ho-Pham et al, 2014), the questionnaire to identify knee symptoms (Clark, Chesworth, Speechley, Petrella, & Maly, 2014;Hamilton et al, 2015), the knee osteoarthritis pre-screening questionnaire (Yazigi, Carnide, Espanha, & Sousa, 2016), the Thai knee osteoarthritis screening questionnaire (Thai-KOA-SQ) (Satayavongthip, Kerdchantuk, Hanrinth, Methieng, & Khunpimul, 2011) and the knee and hip osteoarthritis screening questionnaire (KHOA-SQ) (Quintana et al, 2007). Instruments varied in size from three items (Thai KOA-SQ) to 21 items (PHIND-OA), with eight questionnaires including self-reported signs and symptoms and three including physician-assessed diagnosis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%