2020
DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the Student Practice Evaluation Form—Revised (Second Edition) (SPEF‐R2): The first action research cycle

Abstract: Introduction The Student Practice Evaluation Form—Revised Edition (SPEF‐R) is used by all Australian universities to assess the capability and performance of occupational therapy students on block practice placements. The occupational therapy landscape in Australia has evolved significantly since the SPEF‐R was developed. This study aimed to review the SPEF‐R and develop a revised edition, the SPEF‐R2. Methods The first cycle of an action research process involved four phases: (a) mapping the SPEF‐R to the Aus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Convenience sampling was used to recruit participants. The survey used in the previous action research cycle (Caine et al, 2020), which focussed on perceptions of the draft SPEF‐R2, included a question to identify practice educators interested in piloting the tool. Those who indicated interest were contacted and offered the opportunity to register for participation in the pilot of the SPEF‐R2.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Convenience sampling was used to recruit participants. The survey used in the previous action research cycle (Caine et al, 2020), which focussed on perceptions of the draft SPEF‐R2, included a question to identify practice educators interested in piloting the tool. Those who indicated interest were contacted and offered the opportunity to register for participation in the pilot of the SPEF‐R2.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples under each item are more specific to practice …” (Participant 13). Some free text comments about the amount of repetition and duplication favourably compared the pilot version of the SPEF‐R2 to the earlier version reviewed in Cycle 1 (Caine et al, 2020). For example, participants stated the SPEF‐R2 was “a better document with less duplication” (Participant 7), “there seemed to be less doubling up of information” (Participant 2), and “items in each domain are more succinct and some domains are ‘tighter’ (less items now)” (Participant 22).…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations