2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/734/3/032028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the subroutine library ‘UMMDp’ for anisotropic yield functions commonly applicable to commercial FEM codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the four-node plane stress element (CPS4R) is used and the mesh is defined as regular, with a total of 858 elements. A user-defined material subroutine, Unified Material Model Driver for Plasticity (UMMDp) [21], is used to model the material behaviour. The boundary conditions were imposed as displacements along the y-direction on the top boundary of the specimen and fixed as 0 on the bottom boundary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the four-node plane stress element (CPS4R) is used and the mesh is defined as regular, with a total of 858 elements. A user-defined material subroutine, Unified Material Model Driver for Plasticity (UMMDp) [21], is used to model the material behaviour. The boundary conditions were imposed as displacements along the y-direction on the top boundary of the specimen and fixed as 0 on the bottom boundary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material and Constitutive Models Under Analysis. The materials used in the simulations were the DP600 dual-phase steel and the AA3104 aluminum alloy, which behaviors were modelled using the UMMDp (Unified Material Model Driver for Plasticity) from Jancae (Japan Association of Nonlinear CAE) [24]. Concerning the constitutive models under analysis, the Swift hardening law [5], the Voce law [25], the Yld2000-2D for the yield criterion [6] and the Armstrong-Frederick 1966 model (denoted as A-F model) [26] for the kinematic hardening were implemented.…”
Section: Fig 2 Hole Expansion Test Configuration (Dimensions In Mm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of numerical element used was the CPS4R. The material behavior was implemented using the UMMDp developed by JANCAE (Japan Association of Nonlinear CAE) [23]. Both specimens were subjected to uniaxial loading conditions by imposing a displacement up to rupture.…”
Section: Mechanical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%