1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02511804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the technology of injecting pulverized-coal fuel into the blast furnace (Analysis of world practice for the period 1993–1997)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6) On the other hand, it seems highly likely that more emission of un-burnt char under higher PCR conditions should yield higher degrees of fine holdup at the lower part of the furnace, which results in more fine trapped on the deadman surface or at roots of the cohesive zone and then causes increased pressure losses. Consequently, techniques such as Double Lance Injection, 7) Excentric Double Lance, 8) Oxycoal Lance, 9) Coal Preheating, 10) and Co-axial Lances, 11) etc., have been developed or been under development for better coal combustibility. Another viewpoint mainly remarked by Kobe Steel is that the emitted un-burnt char prior to bed coke be gasified by the solution loss reaction and be fully utilized to replace lump coke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) On the other hand, it seems highly likely that more emission of un-burnt char under higher PCR conditions should yield higher degrees of fine holdup at the lower part of the furnace, which results in more fine trapped on the deadman surface or at roots of the cohesive zone and then causes increased pressure losses. Consequently, techniques such as Double Lance Injection, 7) Excentric Double Lance, 8) Oxycoal Lance, 9) Coal Preheating, 10) and Co-axial Lances, 11) etc., have been developed or been under development for better coal combustibility. Another viewpoint mainly remarked by Kobe Steel is that the emitted un-burnt char prior to bed coke be gasified by the solution loss reaction and be fully utilized to replace lump coke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%