1975
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.1803.541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the Voicing Contrast: Perception of Stop Consonants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained above, probit analysis fits identification functions to a cumulative normal curve, providing a mean (50% point) and standard deviation (Finney, 1971). The mean 50% crossover point for children with SLI was at 24.2 ms, while that for typically developing children was at 25.8 ms, a nonsignificant difference, F(1, 160) = 2.59, p = .109, ω 2 = .04, As a measure of the sharpness of the labeling boundaries, standard deviations from the probit analyses were used to calculate boundary widths (Kuhl & Miller, 1978;Zlatin & Koenigsknecht, 1975). Boundary width was defined as the linear distance between the 25th and 75th percentiles as determined by the mean and standard deviation obtained from probit analysis.…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained above, probit analysis fits identification functions to a cumulative normal curve, providing a mean (50% point) and standard deviation (Finney, 1971). The mean 50% crossover point for children with SLI was at 24.2 ms, while that for typically developing children was at 25.8 ms, a nonsignificant difference, F(1, 160) = 2.59, p = .109, ω 2 = .04, As a measure of the sharpness of the labeling boundaries, standard deviations from the probit analyses were used to calculate boundary widths (Kuhl & Miller, 1978;Zlatin & Koenigsknecht, 1975). Boundary width was defined as the linear distance between the 25th and 75th percentiles as determined by the mean and standard deviation obtained from probit analysis.…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a link between perceptual identification categories and VOT values used in production, and the VOT difference needed to distinguish 'voiced' versus 'voiceless' shows a reduction with age until adultlike perception is achieved at around 6 years [Lisker and Abramson, 1967;Zlatin and Koenigsknecht, 1975]. This age effect in perception may be due to peripheral or central auditory processing, or it may be due to the speaker's own changes in speech production [Flege and Eefting, 1986].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early stages of the acquisition of the voicing contrast, infants do not appear to be limited by their perceptual abilities as they are able to perceive categorical differences in VOT before they are able to reproduce them [Wolf, 1973;Zlatin and Koenigsknecht, 1975;Aslin et al, 1983]. However, there is a link between perceptual identification categories and VOT values used in production, and the VOT difference needed to distinguish 'voiced' versus 'voiceless' shows a reduction with age until adultlike perception is achieved at around 6 years [Lisker and Abramson, 1967;Zlatin and Koenigsknecht, 1975].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two previous studies tested whether a correlation existed between the age of English-learning children and the lo cation of their category boundaries. One study showed a significant positive correla tion for children 20-50 months of age [Bai ley and Haggard, 1980], but the other showed a negative correlation for children aged 2-14 years [Simon and Fourcin, 1978], Zlatin and Koenigsknecht [1975] examined the labelling of synthetic VOT continua by English-speaking adults and children aged 2 and 6 years. The location of the adults' and children's boundaries did not differ sig nificantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%