2007
DOI: 10.1080/00223890701331856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the Weight- and Body-Related Shame and Guilt Scale (WEB–SG) in a Nonclinical Sample of Obese Individuals

Abstract: In this article, we present the evaluation of the psychometric properties of a new self-report measure of Weight- and Body-Related Shame and Guilt (WEB-SG). The main purpose of the study was to measure shame and guilt feelings separately in obese individuals and investigate differing behavioral and emotional correlates of these emotions. Altogether, 331 obese participants completed the WEB-SG and other established self-report measures. A subset of the participants completed a 6-month follow-up. The WEB-SG prov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
81
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
11
81
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Shame is a key emotional mechanism in the COBWEBS model because overweight and obesity elicit high levels of shame (Conradt et al, 2007). For example, Fredrickson and Roberts's (1997) objectification theory posits that cultural ideals of female beauty conspire to increase shame, and this is particularly evident among individuals with higher BMIs (Fredrickson, Roberts, Noll, Quinn, & Twenge, 1998).…”
Section: Emotional Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shame is a key emotional mechanism in the COBWEBS model because overweight and obesity elicit high levels of shame (Conradt et al, 2007). For example, Fredrickson and Roberts's (1997) objectification theory posits that cultural ideals of female beauty conspire to increase shame, and this is particularly evident among individuals with higher BMIs (Fredrickson, Roberts, Noll, Quinn, & Twenge, 1998).…”
Section: Emotional Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that guilt arises in response to a specific behavior, and not the person as a whole, as is the case for shame, guilt is typically less painful than shame and may motivate reparative action in attempt to fix the transgression (Conradt et al, 2007;Sabiston et al, 2010). Consistent with this notion and generalized self-conscious emotion research, body-related guilt has been shown to be weakly or unrelated with psychopathological indicators (e.g., depression; Castonguay, Sabiston, Crocker, & Mack, 2014;Conradt et al, 2007;Kim, Thibodeau, & Jorgensen, 2011), and guilt has demonstrated positive associations with the prosocial behavior of physical activity (e.g., Sabiston et al, 2010;Teixeira, Carraca, Markland, Silva, & Ryan, 2012). Hence, guilt may predict positive health behaviors.…”
Section: Self-conscious Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Weight-and BodyRelated Shame and Guilt scale (WEB-SG; Conradt et al, 2007) is a 12-item measure assessing shame concerned about the body, figure, and weight (6 items; e.g., "I am ashamed of myself when others get to know how much I really weigh") and guilt concerned about eating habits, exercising, and weight control (6 items; e.g., "When I can't manage to work out physically, I feel guilty"). Item responses ranged from 0 (never) to 4 (always).…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obesity-associated feelings of guilt were assessed by the subscale of the Weight-and-Body-Related Shame and Guilt Scale (WEB-SG). 12 Subscale scores for the 6 guilt items range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating more frequent feelings of guilt.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%