Development of Vulnerability Assessment Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction at Three Levels of Geopolitical Units in the Philippines

Abstract

This study developed a comprehensive framework for vulnerability assessment as a tool to measure vulnerability at three levels of geopolitical units in the Philippines. This is a comprehensive multi-disaster framework that can provide information to a decentralized type of government system like the Philippines. The vulnerability assessment framework (VAF) that has been developed was anchored upon the IPCC model and used the integration of community-based monitoring system (CBMS) data, expert inputs, and a series of community-based activities such as consultative fora, focus group discussions, workshops, and risk reduction immersion activities. The developed VAF for the assessment of vulnerability indices (VIs) is a system framework composed of a vulnerability scoping diagram (VSD) and an expanded vulnerability assessment model (VAM). The VSD is composed of three dimensions (e.g., exposure, sensitivity, resiliency), seven identified hazards, with 26, 27, and 29 sub-indicators for household, barangay, and municipal levels, respectively. Measuring vulnerability can be an effective strategy for assessing the potential impact/s of natural disasters on society. The continuous occurrence of natural disasters in the Philippines requires enhancement of public understanding of vulnerability. This would provide transparent understanding and enhance community competency leading to the development of methodologies and tools to assess various factors and indicators of vulnerability. The information extracted from using the VAF and VSD are helpful to the local government units, especially in preparing budgets, strategies, and programs for disaster risk reduction.

Determining Factors Affecting the Protective Behavior of Filipinos in Urban Areas for Natural Calamities Using an Integration of Protection Motivation Theory, Theory of Planned Behavior, and Ergonomic Appraisal: A Sustainable Disaster Preparedness Approach

“…They found that resilience is affected mainly by educational attainment, communication access, vehicles, and portable water as significant indicators for building resilience. Moreover, Robielos et al [34] analyzed the Philippines' vulnerability to natural disasters and formulated a vulnerability assessment framework for disaster risk reduction, in which the authors utilized the vulnerability scoping diagram and the vulnerability assessment model to compose the framework, which is grounded by the IPCC model and integrates community-based monitoring systems, expert inputs, and several community-based activities. The authors found that understanding vulnerability towards natural calamities improves a community's competency regarding disaster risk reduction.…”

Disaster Risk Reduction Education in School Geography Curriculum: Review and Outlook from a Perspective of China

“…DRR education is effective at all stages of the crisis, but its impact is even more in preparation [30]. DRR education should be taught not only using textbooks but also through practical and experiential learning activities [39][40][41][42][43]. The acquired knowledge should be applied to the actual daily life environment.…”

“…The DRR-relevant contents in the primary school geography curriculum standards, which belong to the 'action' dimension, was only the management of the Yellow River flood in the 1986 edition [19] (pp. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. As for the 1988 and 1992 editions [20] (pp.…”

The BIDANI Strategy in the Face of the New Normal: Learning from the Experiences of Baybay City in Leyte, Philippines

“…Moreover, the continuous occurrence of natural disasters in the Philippines requires enhancing public understanding of vulnerability. Robielos et al [27] established a Vulnerability Assessment Framework wherein they argued that vulnerability assessment should clearly define the temporal reference, the point in time, or the point of interest-making it essential to investigate the specific disaster events, geographical location, and regional condition. In assessing resiliency, they further identified indicators such as social security, tangible assets, appliances, vehicles, cooperative membership, and social organization, which are household-level data.…”