2015
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, psychometric properties and preliminary clinical validation of a brief, session‐by‐session measure of eating disorder cognitions and behaviors: The ED‐15

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
95
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants completed a battery of self‐report measures, including the ED‐15 (Tatham et al, ), and the EDE‐Q (Fairburn & Beglin, ) for the evaluation of the concurrent validity, as well as collateral measures of depression and psychosocial impairment to evaluate the convergent validity of the ED‐15 scales/factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Participants completed a battery of self‐report measures, including the ED‐15 (Tatham et al, ), and the EDE‐Q (Fairburn & Beglin, ) for the evaluation of the concurrent validity, as well as collateral measures of depression and psychosocial impairment to evaluate the convergent validity of the ED‐15 scales/factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ED‐15 (Tatham et al, ) is a brief 15‐item measure designed to assess eating psychopathology levels over the preceding week. Two attitudinal subscales—weight and shape concerns, and eating concerns—and an overall attitudinal score can be obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“….4 | ED-15(Tatham et al, 2015) The ED-15 was designed to be reactive to changes in eating pathology over a shorter time period than the EDE-Q and other measures. The original version included items that address: weight/shape concerns, eating concerns, and a single item that measures fear of uncontrollable weight gain when one eats (this last item loads equally on both of the other scales, so is not included in either of them).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%