2016
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.160327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, Sensibility, and Validity of a Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease Case Ascertainment Tool

Abstract: This SARD case ascertainment tool has demonstrable sensibility and validity. The use of both screening and confirmatory questions confers added accuracy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex-matched healthy controls (HC) were recruited from hospital/laboratory personnel and were ANA and specific anti-nuclear antibody negative. Information on family history of SARD or rheumatoid arthritis was ascertained using a validated questionnaire [ 26 ]. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Boards of both recruiting hospitals and all participants gave signed informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex-matched healthy controls (HC) were recruited from hospital/laboratory personnel and were ANA and specific anti-nuclear antibody negative. Information on family history of SARD or rheumatoid arthritis was ascertained using a validated questionnaire [ 26 ]. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Boards of both recruiting hospitals and all participants gave signed informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2, 25) We identified subjects with SARDs, defined by having at least one Read code for one of the included conditions: SLE, SSc, Sjogren’s syndrome, dermatomyositis, polymyositis, mixed connective tissue disease, ANCA-associated vasculitis, or Behcet’s disease. (2, 25) We did not include individuals with diagnoses of giant cell arteritis or polymyalgia rheumatica to improve comparability within the SARD cohort, as those conditions exclusively affect an older age group. (26) Read code diagnoses have been previously validated in a similar UK database, and diagnoses of connective tissue diseases were found to be 80% accurate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From July 2013 to October 2018, individuals referred for a rheumatology assessment because of a recently discovered positive ANA test were serially recruited at the Toronto Western and Mount Sinai Hospitals. At the first visit the subjects underwent an extensive history and physical exam seeking symptoms or signs of SARD, with all demographic and clinical data being recorded on a standardized form [9]. Individuals with an ANA !1:160 were stratified into three groups: ANA þ NS individuals lacking SARD criteria as defined by the 1997 ACR criteria for SLE [10], 2013 ACR-EULAR criteria for SSc [11] or 2016 ACR-EULAR criteria for SS [12]; UCTD patients with one or more SARD criteria but with insufficient criteria for a diagnosis; or early (within 2 years of diagnosis) untreated (except antimalarials) SARD patients.…”
Section: Subjects and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%