2016
DOI: 10.22161/ijeab/1.3.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development the Economical Chemical Treatment Plant for Chromium Recovery From Tannery Waste Water

Abstract: Abstract-The provided data given by the Tanneries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Table 1, TE presents a high Cr(III) value reaching 758 mg/L exceeding the Tunisian standards of discharges "NT 106.002" (≤ 0.1 ppm). This is due to the excessive use of Cr during the tanning step (Cassano et al 2001) and to the fact that only 60 to 70% of the Cr used is fixed by the skin (Badar et al 2016). Similar results were reported by Sahu et al (2007), stating that Cr concentrations in the tanning bath are generally in the range of 500 to 5000 mg/L.…”
Section: Tanning Effluent Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Table 1, TE presents a high Cr(III) value reaching 758 mg/L exceeding the Tunisian standards of discharges "NT 106.002" (≤ 0.1 ppm). This is due to the excessive use of Cr during the tanning step (Cassano et al 2001) and to the fact that only 60 to 70% of the Cr used is fixed by the skin (Badar et al 2016). Similar results were reported by Sahu et al (2007), stating that Cr concentrations in the tanning bath are generally in the range of 500 to 5000 mg/L.…”
Section: Tanning Effluent Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…However, the problem with Cr tanning is that only Editorial responsibility: Samareh Mirkia. 60 to 70% of Cr salts react with the hides, meaning that 30 to 40% remain in the solid and liquid wastes (Badar et al 2016). Besides, during the tanning step 1-2 m 3 of effluents is produced per ton of hiding (Dixit et al 2015); therefore, it is considered as one of the most polluting steps in the leather-making process (Raghava Rao et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%