2002
DOI: 10.1079/phn2001318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires – a review

Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this review is to provide guidance on the development, validation and use of food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs) for different study designs. It does not include any recommendations about the most appropriate method for dietary assessment (e.g. food-frequency questionnaire versus weighed record). Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was carried out for publications from 1980 to 1999. Findings from the review were then commented upon and added to by a group of inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

45
1,641
7
84

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,138 publications
(1,777 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
45
1,641
7
84
Order By: Relevance
“…[54] Other shortcomings in dietary assessment using FFQs are issues with measurement error and the tendency to over-estimate consumption of certain foods like fruit and vegetables. [55] Uncontrolled confounding is a limitation with observational work, [56] meaning some other lifestyle or dietary factor, not adequately controlled for or accounted for in models, could explain observations. Therefore evidence from randomised controlled trials would be required to confirm associations as causal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[54] Other shortcomings in dietary assessment using FFQs are issues with measurement error and the tendency to over-estimate consumption of certain foods like fruit and vegetables. [55] Uncontrolled confounding is a limitation with observational work, [56] meaning some other lifestyle or dietary factor, not adequately controlled for or accounted for in models, could explain observations. Therefore evidence from randomised controlled trials would be required to confirm associations as causal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many instances, although pet food companies were contacted by telephone, they frequently did not have specific analytical results, but instead provided the amounts of vitamin D that were included in the vitamin and mineral premix added to their food. Second, food frequency questionnaires are typically used in epidemiologic studies in humans to assess dietary intake in relation to development of disease 40. However, food questionnaires should be validated and compared with a gold standard diet analysis technique for the specific population under study 40, 41.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, food frequency questionnaires are typically used in epidemiologic studies in humans to assess dietary intake in relation to development of disease 40. However, food questionnaires should be validated and compared with a gold standard diet analysis technique for the specific population under study 40, 41. The diet questionnaire used in this study has not been validated and it is possible that vitamin D intake was overestimated in dogs with CHF or underestimated in the unaffected controls, and therefore must be considered a very crude estimation of vitamin D intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 The assessment of eating behaviors has taken various forms (eg, blood tests, food frequency questionnaires, urine tests). 25,26 Field-based research has been considered advantageous because it enables rapid generalizability of findings for applied uses, 27 however eating-behavior assessment can be invasive, expensive, and difficult to accommodate in practical settings. Because the intake of F/V has been considered a proxy for an overall healthy diet, 28,29 and sweets have been categorized as a calorie-dense, nutrient-poor food, 30,31 they represent (positively and negatively based) measures of treatment effects that can be more readily incorporated into field research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%