2014
DOI: 10.15390/eb.2014.3713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, Validity and Reliability Study of the Learning Object Evaluation Scale (LOES)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Table 2, the total variance explained for the five-factor structure of the scale is 57.372%. Gürer and Yıldırım (2014) state that it is sufficient for the total variance to be between 40% and 60% and for any factor to be significant, at least 5% of the total variance explained must be attributed to that factor. Therefore, it can be said that the factors in this study explain the variance at a sufficient level.…”
Section: Exploratory Factor Analysis (Efa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in Table 2, the total variance explained for the five-factor structure of the scale is 57.372%. Gürer and Yıldırım (2014) state that it is sufficient for the total variance to be between 40% and 60% and for any factor to be significant, at least 5% of the total variance explained must be attributed to that factor. Therefore, it can be said that the factors in this study explain the variance at a sufficient level.…”
Section: Exploratory Factor Analysis (Efa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 2, the threefactor construct explained 49.767% of the total variance. The value of total variance between 40% and 60% is claimed to be sufficient for social science studies, and for any factor to be meaningful, at least 5% of the total variance explained should be attributable to that factor (16,39). In addition, according to the EFA results in Table 2, the factor loadings of nine items related to the first factor "Pets" of the ASTA vary between 0.555 and 0.722, and also explain 22.531% of the total variance.…”
Section: Overall Goodness-of-fit Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%