2002
DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2002.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental and Activity Dependent Regulation of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors at Synapses

Abstract: Glutamate receptors mediate the majority of excitatory responses in the central nervous system. The establishment and refinement of glutamatergic synaptic connections depend on the concerted actions of α α α α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate (AMPA), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), and kainate (KA) type ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) and G-protein coupled metabotropic receptors. While a lot remains to be clarified, the most is known about the mechanisms by which the iGluR subtypes are targe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
(280 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because it is increasingly apparent that many aspects of glutamate receptor assembly and trafficking depend on the presence of specific receptor subunits (for review, see Barry and Ziff, 2002;Molnar and Isaac, 2002;Sheng and Hyoung Lee, 2003;van Zundert et al, 2004), a complete grasp of glutamate receptor composition is critical for studies of postsynaptic development and receptor regulation. The Drosophila NMJ is a genetically tractable glutamatergic synapse that is widely exploited for molecular studies of synaptic development, function, and plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is increasingly apparent that many aspects of glutamate receptor assembly and trafficking depend on the presence of specific receptor subunits (for review, see Barry and Ziff, 2002;Molnar and Isaac, 2002;Sheng and Hyoung Lee, 2003;van Zundert et al, 2004), a complete grasp of glutamate receptor composition is critical for studies of postsynaptic development and receptor regulation. The Drosophila NMJ is a genetically tractable glutamatergic synapse that is widely exploited for molecular studies of synaptic development, function, and plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the roles of AMPA and NMDA receptors in mediating fast synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity are relatively well understood (reviewed in Dingledine et al . 1999; Molnar and Isaac 2002), the molecular organization and physiological functions of KARs remains largely obscure. Like AMPA and NMDA receptors, KARs are also widely distributed throughout the CNS (Petralia et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, acute inhibition of TrkB completely blocked the presynaptic changes, including decrease in frequency-dependent facilitation of EPSCs as well as loss of endogenous KAR activity, that are associated with LTP at immature synapses with initially low P r (Lauri et al, 2006). This suggests that, in young tissue, TrkB is not necessary for postsynaptic mechanisms underlying induction and early expression of pairing-induced synaptic potentiation, involving insertion and modified function of AMPA receptors at the postsynaptic density (Molnar and Isaac, 2002;Kerchner and Nicoll, 2008;Hanse et al, 2009). Rather, BDNF/TrkB appears critical for presynaptic plasticity at a stage of development when functional contact already exists but transmission is weak.…”
Section: Fast Activity-dependent Effects Of Trkb Signaling At Immaturmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Neuronal activity is thought to either reinforce or weaken the nascent neuronal connections by using synaptic mechanisms similar to those regulating synaptic efficacy in the adult brain, namely long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), and thereby control selection of synaptic inputs to a given neuron. It is well established that Hebbian-type plasticity mechanisms can control the targeting and insertion of glutamate receptors to the postsynaptic density already at very early stages of synapse development (Molnar and Isaac, 2002;Collingridge et al, 2004;Kerchner and Nicoll, 2008;Hanse et al, 2009). However, the corresponding presynaptic processes controlling activity-dependent maturation of glutamate release machinery are less well characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%