1983
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(83)90043-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental aspects of the generation effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern is consistent with findings that self-generated material is better remembered by adults and children than material that is read or heard (the generation effect; e.g., Calvert, 1991;McFarland, Duncan, & Bruno, 1983;McNamara & Healy, 1995;Slamecka & Graf, 1978). In realworld contexts also, self-generated misinformation is more likely to be incorporated into children's accounts than is misinformation generated by the interviewer (see Holliday, Reyna, & Hayes, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This pattern is consistent with findings that self-generated material is better remembered by adults and children than material that is read or heard (the generation effect; e.g., Calvert, 1991;McFarland, Duncan, & Bruno, 1983;McNamara & Healy, 1995;Slamecka & Graf, 1978). In realworld contexts also, self-generated misinformation is more likely to be incorporated into children's accounts than is misinformation generated by the interviewer (see Holliday, Reyna, & Hayes, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Consistent with these findings, research on a phenomenon known as the generation effect suggests that the act of generating known lexical or semantic information promotes memory for self-generated items (Bertsch, Pesta, Wiscott, & McDaniel, 2007; Gardiner, Gregg, & Hampton, 1988; Gardiner & Hampton, 1985). Furthermore, until approximately 9 years of age, the generation effect is predominantly demonstrated through forced-choice measures as compared to open-ended measures (McFarland, Duncan, & Bruno, 1983). Based on this analogous developmental pattern, it is therefore reasonable to conclude that the act of operating over separate but related facts in order to derive new knowledge might have conferred benefits for retention of that information over a delay, despite having demonstrated this self-derived knowledge in a less robust form initially.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall and recognition of self-generated material is consistently higher than the control condition in which participants read the full stimulus-target word pairs. This effect has been observed as early as 7 years of age and continues to develop throughout the school years (McFarland, Duncan, & Bruno, 1983). Whether the facilitative effect of self-generation extends beyond known semantic content to promote retention of newly derived knowledge is not known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%