2019
DOI: 10.1111/ede.12310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental bias in horned dung beetles and its contributions to innovation, adaptation, and resilience

Abstract: Developmental processes transduce diverse influences during phenotype formation, thereby biasing and structuring amount and type of phenotypic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(230 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Take, for example, research on developmental bias in horned dung beetles in the genus Onthophagus. These studies try to integrate explanations of (a) gene regulatory networks that pattern specific body regions, (b) plastic developmental mechanisms that coordinate environmental responses, and (c) developmental symbioses and niche construction that enable organisms to build assemblages and to modify their own selective environments (see Hu et al 2020;Schwab et al 2019). Such attempts at complex integration within EES might be problematic if there are different explanatory standards at work in the relevant explanations involving niche construction, inclusive inheritance, developmental bias and plasticity, as well as microbiomes.…”
Section: Advantages Of This Framework For the Eesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Take, for example, research on developmental bias in horned dung beetles in the genus Onthophagus. These studies try to integrate explanations of (a) gene regulatory networks that pattern specific body regions, (b) plastic developmental mechanisms that coordinate environmental responses, and (c) developmental symbioses and niche construction that enable organisms to build assemblages and to modify their own selective environments (see Hu et al 2020;Schwab et al 2019). Such attempts at complex integration within EES might be problematic if there are different explanatory standards at work in the relevant explanations involving niche construction, inclusive inheritance, developmental bias and plasticity, as well as microbiomes.…”
Section: Advantages Of This Framework For the Eesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, the contributions to this special issue illustrate that the study of developmental bias spans different biological domains (and thus implicates different fields): gene regulation (e.g., Hu et al, ), parthenogenesis (Galis & van Alphen, ), phenotypic plasticity (Draghi, ; Levis & Pfennig, ; Parsons et al, ; Uller et al, ), the morphology of extant and fossil species (Jablonski, ; Jackson, ), brain development (Finlay & Huang, ), symbiosis and interactions involving microbial species (Gilbert, ), development of the vertebrate skeleton (Kavanagh, ), and behavior, learning, and niche construction (Hu et al, ; Laland et al, ), among others. Some of the studies are experimental, some include field work, and others make primarily use of theory and computational simulation (Draghi, ; Hordijk & Altenberg, ).…”
Section: Generating Disciplinary and Intellectual Identitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Salazar-Ciudad (2006) made the suggestion to replace the concept of developmental constraint with the concept of the variational properties of a developmental mechanism, which might also be a possible alternative to "developmental bias." Cases of niche construction and animal learning can lead to biases, in which case organism-environment mutual influences, organism-organism interactions, and animal behavior are part of the "developmental" account (Hu et al, 2019;Laland et al, 2019). As a result, my view is that for the purpose of setting a compelling explanatory agenda and of generating significant intellectual identity across different research projects, the label of "developmental bias" is preferable (similar to how the notion of novelty emphasizes the origin of quantitatively new structures).…”
Section: Why Specifically Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations