1999
DOI: 10.1006/drev.1998.0475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Changes in Human Duration Judgments: A Meta-Analytic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
83
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the psychological present represents the time period that is considered to be a single unit by observers, with the processing of durations within the psychological present possibly making use of different mechanisms than processing outside of the psychological present (Block, 1990;Rammsayer, 2001). According to Block, Zakay, and Hancock (1999), the typical use of temporal information in everyday life occurs within the psychological present, which is thought to be on the order of 3-5 s. This, then, might be the underlying mechanism of how tonal determinations are made, with listeners desiring information to reside within a single temporal unit for their judgments of psychological stability. Although speculative, the idea of temporal constraints on tonal determination, regardless of whether they arise from memory factors, psychoacoustic bases, or everyday experiences of temporal units, is an intriguing possibility and one that should be explored in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the psychological present represents the time period that is considered to be a single unit by observers, with the processing of durations within the psychological present possibly making use of different mechanisms than processing outside of the psychological present (Block, 1990;Rammsayer, 2001). According to Block, Zakay, and Hancock (1999), the typical use of temporal information in everyday life occurs within the psychological present, which is thought to be on the order of 3-5 s. This, then, might be the underlying mechanism of how tonal determinations are made, with listeners desiring information to reside within a single temporal unit for their judgments of psychological stability. Although speculative, the idea of temporal constraints on tonal determination, regardless of whether they arise from memory factors, psychoacoustic bases, or everyday experiences of temporal units, is an intriguing possibility and one that should be explored in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of performance observed in young children by McCormack et al (1999) can be described as overestimation, in that test durations that are shorter than the standard are erroneously judged to be of the same length as it. However, unlike in the verbal estimation tasks reviewed by Block et al (1999), young childrenÕs pattern of errors in the temporal generalization task cannot be explained in terms of difficulties with objective units of time, because the judgments made on this task do not involve such units. The fact that McCormack et al could successfully model their findings in terms of the distortion in long-term memory of the representation of the standard suggests that, in some circumstances, overestimation of durations by young children may be a result of changes in long-term memory processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Developmental improvements in time estimation over childhood have been documented consistently in a large number of studies, using a wide variety of tasks (e.g., Arlin, 1986;Droit-Volet, 1999;Friedman, 1977;Pouthas & Jacquet, 1987; for review, see Block, Zakay, & Hancock, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past few years, a standard convention has been adopted to facilitate comparisons among studies and enable meta-analyses on topics of duration perception. The duration judgment ratio (described by Block, Zakay, & Hancock, 1999) is the ratio of subjective duration to clock duration. Of methodological and conceptual importance is the distinction between prospective duration, which is the duration that is judged when an individual knows in advance to attend to time, as distinct from retrospective duration, an estimate made after the duration has elapsed without forewarning to attend to the time.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%