1995
DOI: 10.1016/0887-8994(95)00086-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental changes in P300 wave elicited during two different experimental conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Auditory P300 has a centro-parietal distribution that increases in amplitude and decreases in latency (Martin et al, 1988;Ladish and Polich, 1989) steadily from age 5 to age 19. This pattern is observed for both active and passive oddball tasks (from 1 to 21 years: Fuchigami et al, 1995). In contrast, both the amplitude and latency of visual P300 appear to decrease from age 10 to age 21 (Katsanis et al, 1996; but see Ridderinkhof and van der Stelt, 2000).…”
Section: Normal Developmentmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Auditory P300 has a centro-parietal distribution that increases in amplitude and decreases in latency (Martin et al, 1988;Ladish and Polich, 1989) steadily from age 5 to age 19. This pattern is observed for both active and passive oddball tasks (from 1 to 21 years: Fuchigami et al, 1995). In contrast, both the amplitude and latency of visual P300 appear to decrease from age 10 to age 21 (Katsanis et al, 1996; but see Ridderinkhof and van der Stelt, 2000).…”
Section: Normal Developmentmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We further predict that P3a measured from difference waveforms would decrease in amplitude across adolescence. We could not predict changes in P3a latency due to contradictory outcomes from existing studies [12,21]. The present study aims to provide a more accurate description of P3a development across adolescence by grouping large numbers of adolescents into 1-year age groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The stimuli were separated by a jittered stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) of 0.9-1.1 s to minimize the confounding effect of ERP artifacts related to anticipation of a stimulus and overt attention [22]. The stimuli had a stimulus duration of 175 ms in order to (1) meet the standard guidelines to record MMN [24], and (2) facilitate adequate comparison with previous studies of maturation of MMN and P3a in adolescents [11,12,21]. …”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 The results of this study showed that the components of auditory ERPs vary in a systemic pattern in children between the ages of 6 and 13 years. Although ERPs have been studied in children younger than 6 years, 27 we excluded participants younger than 6 years because the greater latency variability in younger children may confound our data analysis. Our data are consistent with the results of previous studies showing that P3 and N2 latencies decrease with age.…”
Section: Latencymentioning
confidence: 99%