1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.1995.tb00058.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental differences in baserate estimates of social behaviors and attitudes

Abstract: This study examined the development of baserate estimation skills for everyday social events and attitudes. Subjects in grades one, three, and six responded to questions concerning their own rates of behavior and attitudes, and their estimates of baserates of behaviors and attitudes for their classmates. The findings indicate a general increase in accuracy for the estimation of baserates throughout the elementary school years. In addition, younger subjects were less likely to make similar estimates for themsel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is difficult to pinpoint why this occurred, this result might fit in with children's ability to integrate frequencies and base rates into their decision making. Although there is evidence that children can accurately estimate the frequencies of stimuli encountered in a lab settings (e.g., N. R. Ellis, Palmer, & Reese, 1988), they are less able to make use of frequencies for naturally occurring events (e.g., Jacobs, Greenwald, & Osgood, 1995). Klaczynski (2001) suggested that estimation and general statistical reasoning abilities continue to develop steadily through adolescence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is difficult to pinpoint why this occurred, this result might fit in with children's ability to integrate frequencies and base rates into their decision making. Although there is evidence that children can accurately estimate the frequencies of stimuli encountered in a lab settings (e.g., N. R. Ellis, Palmer, & Reese, 1988), they are less able to make use of frequencies for naturally occurring events (e.g., Jacobs, Greenwald, & Osgood, 1995). Klaczynski (2001) suggested that estimation and general statistical reasoning abilities continue to develop steadily through adolescence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure assessed the understanding of social norms (16 items), and was adopted from Loeber (1989) and Jacobs et al (1995) . Participants first endorsed whether or not it is “sometimes OK” to engage in several behaviors that may be deemed undesirable (e.g., to steal under certain circumstances).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second task assesses individuals' ability to judge likelihood, using a strategy following Jacobs et al (1995) and Loeber (1989). Respondents first answered 16 questions, asking whether they ''think it is sometimes OK'' to engage in various negative behaviors (e.g., ''using your fists to resolve a conflict'').…”
Section: Operationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%