2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10804-005-7089-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Differences in Metacognition and their Connections with Cognitive Development in Adulthood

Abstract: This study investigated developmental differences in some metacognitive variables in illdefined problem solving and their possible connections with cognitive development in adulthood. Participants were 57 individuals of different ages (adolescents, young adults, mature adults and older adults). They solved one well-defined and six ill-defined problems while their thinking-aloud was taped. They then answered a metacognitive statements questionnaire. Differences in performance were statistically significant in a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies with young adults have found that metacognitive training improved their problem solving (Delclos and Harrington 1991;Kluwe 1987) and mathematical abilities (Van Haneghan and Baker 1989). In a study of the links between metacognition and problem-solving performance in adulthood, Vukman (2005) suggested that the most important change in the field of metacognition is the ability to reflect precisely on one's own thinking processes. A highly significant correlation was observed between reflection on the thinking process and the way ill-defined problems were solved.…”
Section: Metacognition and Problem Solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies with young adults have found that metacognitive training improved their problem solving (Delclos and Harrington 1991;Kluwe 1987) and mathematical abilities (Van Haneghan and Baker 1989). In a study of the links between metacognition and problem-solving performance in adulthood, Vukman (2005) suggested that the most important change in the field of metacognition is the ability to reflect precisely on one's own thinking processes. A highly significant correlation was observed between reflection on the thinking process and the way ill-defined problems were solved.…”
Section: Metacognition and Problem Solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has also shown that other capacities, overlapping with the self-management skills assessed in the study, continue to develop into early adulthood. For example, between the ages of 18 and 30, youth experience increases metacognition (Vukman, 2005), attentional control (Plude, Enns, & Brodeur, 1994), emotion regulation (John & Gross, 2004), and perspective taking (Eisenberg, Cumberland, & Guthrie, 2005). Studies investigating neurodevelopment over the transition to adulthood have also shown that brain areas associated with behavioral and emotional regulation do not fully develop until as late as the mid-20s (e.g., Bartzokis et al, 2001; Gogtay et al, 2004; Shaw et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, dialectical thinkers recognize that any solution to, or stabilization of, a complex problem or issue will always be subject to changes and challenges because this is the nature of the tensionto resolution-to tension cycle dynamic of issues (Blouin & McKelvie, 2012). Vukman (2005) summarized the relativistic and dialectical characteristics involved in postformal problem solving from the work of Kramer (1989Kramer ( , 1990 and Sinnott (1984Sinnott ( , 1989):…”
Section: Formal Thinking Postformal Thinking and Adult Complex Probmentioning
confidence: 99%