1977
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.13.1.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental differences in the memory search of categorized lists.

Abstract: Third and sixth graders were tested in a recognition memory task with short lists of items from either one or two categories. The latency data for one-category lists of either letters or digits were consistent with a serial-exhaustive model of memory search for both third and sixth graders. It was also found that the young children searched these lists more slowly than did the older children. For two-category lists, developmental differences were found in children's ability to use the category information to f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar conclusion was reached by Keating and Bobbitt (1978). The rate of search following encoding also improves with age (Herrmann & Landis, 1977;Naus & Ornstein, 1977). Clearly, it is premature to implicate either the encoding or the comparison stage of processing to accommodate the finding that the magnitude of the symbolic distance effect reduces with age.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…A similar conclusion was reached by Keating and Bobbitt (1978). The rate of search following encoding also improves with age (Herrmann & Landis, 1977;Naus & Ornstein, 1977). Clearly, it is premature to implicate either the encoding or the comparison stage of processing to accommodate the finding that the magnitude of the symbolic distance effect reduces with age.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…There was no effect on ability to solve the discrimination problems, but the more highly exposed children took longer to reach the correct solution. This decreased efficiency may reflect more limited resources for processing problems requiring mental effort (Kail, 1986), slower execution of cognitive instructions (by analogy to “central processor cycle time” in a computer; Kail, 1991), or differences in task-relevant knowledge (Roth, 1983), strategies for performing the task (Naus & Ornstein, 1977), or level of motivation (Detterman, 1987). It has been suggested that processing efficiency may be an important determinant of efficiency in reading (Campione, Brown, & Ferrara, 1982), with faster readers having the ability to process a larger amount of text per visual fixation (Cooper & Regan, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the slope reduction in the two-category condition of the first experiment clearly indicates strategic efficiency. Naus and her co-investigators (Naus, 1974;Naus et al, 1972;Naus & Ornstein, 1977) postulated a random entry model to account for the slope reduction. According to their model, items are stored by category, and the initial selection of which category to search is random.…”
Section: Search and Retrieval Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naus and her coinvestigators (Naus, 1974;Naus, Glucksberg, & Ornstein, 1972;Naus & Ornstein, 1977) presented evidence that when memory sets consist of items from more than one category, subjects tend to alter their search strategy; once they have searched the appropriate category, they ignore the remaining category or categories and execute a response. The result is reduced search and retrieval latencies (slope reduction).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%