2017
DOI: 10.1111/acer.13506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Etiologies of Alcohol Use and Their Relations to Parent and Peer Influences Over Adolescence and Young Adulthood: A Genetically Informed Approach

Abstract: Background Distinct changes in alcohol use etiologies occur during adolescence and young adulthood. Additionally, measured environments known to influence alcohol use such as peers and parenting practice can interact or be associated with this genetic influence. However, change in genetic and environmental influence over age, as well as how associations with measured environments change over age, is understudied. Methods The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) sibling subsample was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exploratory analyses comparing parent to peer conformity revealed adolescents were equally likely to conform to their parents and peers when both endorsed attitudes that conflicted with the adolescents’ attitudes (i.e., on Mutual Conflict trials). These results challenge prior research showing that one source of influence typically outweighs the other in adolescence ( Biddle et al, 1980 ; Deutsch et al, 2017 ; Utech and Hoving, 1969 ) and suggest that, even when they endorse opposing attitudes, parents and peers exert a similar influence on attitudes toward everyday behaviors in early adolescence. Indiscriminate patterns of conformity toward peers and parents may have stemmed from the increased difficulty of resolving conflict between their own attitudes and those of multiple sources of influence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploratory analyses comparing parent to peer conformity revealed adolescents were equally likely to conform to their parents and peers when both endorsed attitudes that conflicted with the adolescents’ attitudes (i.e., on Mutual Conflict trials). These results challenge prior research showing that one source of influence typically outweighs the other in adolescence ( Biddle et al, 1980 ; Deutsch et al, 2017 ; Utech and Hoving, 1969 ) and suggest that, even when they endorse opposing attitudes, parents and peers exert a similar influence on attitudes toward everyday behaviors in early adolescence. Indiscriminate patterns of conformity toward peers and parents may have stemmed from the increased difficulty of resolving conflict between their own attitudes and those of multiple sources of influence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although one of the goals of this study was to study HID in an understudied segment of the population, the generalizability of the findings might be limited by focusing on working‐age adults. In particular, there is evidence from twin studies of alcohol involvement that the contribution of genetic and common environmental influences change across development (e.g., Deutsch, Wood, and Slutske, ; Kendler et al, , ). In particular, the proportions of variation in HID propensity due to common environmental influences would likely be higher among adolescents and college‐aged young adults than in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stage when mental health problems develop or the duration of the problems may present different associations with later alcohol use [31]. Also, drinking behaviours during adolescence are largely influenced by social context (mainly peers and parents) [32][33][34][35][36][37], while drinking patterns in adulthood may be more established [38]. Robust sex differences in the prevalence of both mental health problems and alcohol use behaviours were found [39][40][41][42], however, how sex may play a role in the association between mental health and alcohol use is yet unclear, and how sex is treated in the analysis (whether male and female subjects are analysed separately, or sex is adjusted for or added as an interaction term with mental health problems) varies across studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%