The transforming growth factor- (TGF-) receptor interacting protein TRIP-1 was originally identified as a WD40 repeat-containing protein that has the ability to associate with the TGF- type II receptor and is phosphorylated by it (1). However, its function was not known. We now show that TRIP-1 expression represses the ability of TGF- to induce transcription from the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promoter, a common reporter of the TGF--induced gene expression response, but does not affect the ability of TGF- to inhibit cyclin A transcription. TRIP-1 can also inhibit the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression induced by Smads as well as activated TGF- type I receptors. Its inhibitory effect is exerted by a combination of receptordependent and receptor-independent mechanisms. Deletion mutational analysis revealed that two distinct regions, which do not contain recognizable WD40 repeats, are required for the ability of TRIP-1 to inhibit the gene expression response. Expression of other segments of TRIP-1 increased the TGF--induced gene expression response and therefore may exert a dominant negative phenotype. We conclude that TRIP-1 acts as a modulator of the TGF- response.
Transforming growth factor- (TGF-)1 is the prototype member of a superfamily of growth factors, which have many roles in growth regulation, wound healing, immunity, and development. Most notably, TGF- is a potent growth inhibitor for many cell types and induces a variety of extracellular matrix proteins and adhesion receptors (2). The current model for TGF- signaling invokes the binding of ligand to the type II TGF- receptor, which results in the recruitment, phosphorylation, and concomitant activation of type I TGF- receptors. The activated type I receptor then phosphorylates Smad2 or Smad3, which is then released from the receptor and forms a complex with Smad4. This complex then translocates to the nucleus where it interacts with transcription factors and regulates gene expression (3).Although Smads clearly act as effectors of TGF- receptor signaling, several lines of evidence indicate that other factors are probably involved in TGF- signal transduction. The ability of a dominant negative type II receptor to inhibit TGF--mediated growth inhibition but not extracellular matrix production suggests that the pathways leading to these effects of TGF- are distinct and separable (4) and may be differentially regulated via quantitatively different thresholds of signaling (5). Consistent with this notion, specific residues on the type I (6) or type II (7) receptor have been identified that are dispensable for TGF- stimulation of extracellular matrix production but required for the antimitogenic effect. The Smads have been found to mediate both the extracellular matrix and the antimitogenic signaling pathways (3,8,9), and no evidence yet presented has indicated a role for Smads in differentially modulating distinct TGF- signaling pathways. Thus, although the basis for distinction between these pathways is not well underst...