An analysis of adjudicated divorce decisions in two Chinese provinces reveals the extent to which and the reasons why Chinese courts subvert the global legal norms they symbolically embrace. In China, uncontested no-fault divorces are readily attainable outside the court system. Courts, by contrast, granted divorces in fewer than half of the cases they adjudicated. Despite an abundance of formal legal mechanisms designed to provide relief to victims of marital abuse, a plaintiff's claim of domestic violence did not increase the probability a court granted a divorce request. Chinese courts' highly institutionalized practice of denying first-attempt divorce petitions and granting divorces on subsequent litigation attempts disproportionately impacts women and has spawned a sizable population of female marital-violence refugees. These findings carry substantive and theoretical implications concerning the limits and possibilities of the local penetration of global legal norms.A 27-year-old female plaintiff from a village in Huojia County, Henan Province, seeking to divorce her husband in court supported her claim of marital abuse with medical documentation showing a diagnosis of a vertebral fracture. In his defense statement, her husband rebutted, "I did not beat the 1 This research came to fruition only because of the generous support of Benjamin Liebman, Rachel Stern, and Alice Wang, who collected and shared the raw data from Henan Province. I am grateful to Ke Li, my former student, for reversing roles and teaching me much about Chinese divorce litigation and serving as a critically helpful sounding board as I worked through the data. All errors are my own. Hai Hu and Zuoyu Tian provided key technical assistance with the collection and preparation of data.