“…First, the manipulation of control was associated, specifically in the verbal modality, with neural patterns in a wide-spread, left-hemisphere dominant frontotemporal network, involving the inferior pFC, the supramarginal gyrus, and the temporo-occipital cortices. The regions of this network are known to support controlled phonological and orthographic segmentation and comparison processes (Deng, Chou, Ding, Peng, & Booth, 2011;Booth, Mehdiratta, Burman, & Bitan, 2008); these processes may have allowed participants, in the auditory-verbal high control condition, to segment the incoming speech stream and explicitly compare the segmented stimuli to the target stimulus category defined by both phonological and orthographic characteristics. This may also have included attempts at rehearsing the target stimuli in the high control condition (as each target stimulus is followed by a nontarget stimulus, which can be actively ignored, leaving some small room for verbal rehearsal); in the low control conditions, this strategy is indeed very unlikely as verbal rehearsal in standard running span conditions, which come closest to the low control trials used in this study, is known to be very difficult to implement and even worsens performance (Bhatarah, Ward, Smith, & Hayes, 2009;Hockey, 1973).…”