1991
DOI: 10.1177/027112149101000402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Interventions for Biologically At-Risk Infants at Home

Abstract: There has been a dramatic reduction in mortality rates for premature/low birthweight infants. Surviving infants are at increased developmental risk. Efforts to enhance the development of infants have taken many forms. Experimental studies investigating the effects of home-based early intervention are reviewed in this article. Implications are drawn for early interventionists.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early studies documented the effectiveness of early intervention with low birth weight premature infants in general (Sandall, 1990;Casto et al, 1987), but most of these earlier studies excluded infants with neurological insults such as IVH. Exceptions include studies by Resnick, Armstrong and Carter (1988), Piper et al (1986) and the project described here.…”
Section: Abstract: Developmental Disability Parental Stress Intervmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies documented the effectiveness of early intervention with low birth weight premature infants in general (Sandall, 1990;Casto et al, 1987), but most of these earlier studies excluded infants with neurological insults such as IVH. Exceptions include studies by Resnick, Armstrong and Carter (1988), Piper et al (1986) and the project described here.…”
Section: Abstract: Developmental Disability Parental Stress Intervmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the field of early intervention has long accepted the validity of the transactional model of development, the infusion of this theoretical perspective into practice has been a gradual, evolutionary process (Sandall, 1990(Sandall, , 1993. The difficulty of translating this theoretical model into practice is related in part to the fact that it challenges some of the roles and practices traditionally assumed by intervention specialists (e.g., working directly with the child and identifying stimulating activities that are uniquely suited to addressing the child's developmental needs) and requires interventionists to reappraise their professional relationships with parents (e.g., from expert clinician to advisor and partner of parents; Beckman, Robinson, Rosenberg, & Filer, 1994; Bradley, Knoll, & Agosta, 1992; Minde & Scott, 1995;Sheehan & Sites, 1989).…”
Section: Relationship-focused Intervention Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%