Developmental patterns in priming and familiarity in explicit recollection

Billingsley, Rebecca L.; Smith, Mary Lou; McAndrews, Mary Pat

doi:10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00007-3

Cited by 112 publications

(101 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The present behavioral findings are in line with those in previous studies (Billingsley et al, 2002;Cycowicz et al, 2003;Cycowicz et al, 2001). In the present study, the performance in the target word condition proved to be lower than that in the target photo condition.…”

Section: Behavioral Performancesupporting

confidence: 94%

“…Behavioral studies indicate that item, as well as source, memory performance increases with age, with a steeper increase in performance for source, as compared with item, information (see Billingsley, Smith, & McAndrews, 2002;Gathercole, 1998;Giles, Gopnik, & Heyman, 2002). Unfortunately, quite often these findings have been based on very few items or have not been directly comparable, since many of the studies were based on recall tasks or face-to-face interviews, which have been shown to be susceptible to the format of the questions (e.g., Roebers & Howie, 2003).…”

Section: Development Of Item and Source Memory In Childhoodmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rather, it was correlated with performance in neuropsychological tests of frontal lobe functions (i.e., word fluency and behavioral inhibition; Cycowicz et al, 2001). Billingsley et al (2002) examined the developmental trajectory of implicit and explicit memory with four age groups between 8 and 19 years. Although no age differences were found for perceptual and conceptual priming, explicit picture recognition memory was lower for 8-to 10-year-old children, as compared with older participants.…”

Section: Development Of Item and Source Memory In Childhoodmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although the number of correct know responses was at floor level for all groups, the poorer performance by the youngest group was paralleled by a lower number of remember judgments, as compared with the older participants. When the false alarms connected with know responses were included in the analyses, it became apparent that the know category was used more often by the youngest children but that they were unable to differentiate between old and new items within this category (Billingsley et al, 2002).…”

Section: Development Of Item and Source Memory In Childhoodmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Age-related differences in familiarity and recollection: ERP evidence from a recognition memory study in children and young adults

Czernochowski

Mecklinger

Johansson

et al. 2005

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we examined the relative contributions of familiarity and recollection to recognition memory for items and their study contexts in school-aged children and adults. Whereas adults were able to selectively accept target items and to reject familiar nontarget items in an exclusion task, this discrimination was more difficult for children, as was evident in the high false alarm rates to nontargets even when item memory was controlled for. The analysis of the adults' ERPs revealed more flexible and task-appropriate retrieval mechanisms, as was evident in the correlates of familiarity, recollection, and nontarget retrieval, as well as in postretrieval evaluation. In contrast, children's ERPs revealed a parietal old/new effect for targets taken as a putative correlate of recollection. These findings suggest that children rely predominantly on recollection during recognition judgments, even in the absence of efficient memory control processes. The latter processes enable adults to monitor and verify the retrieved information and to control nontarget retrieval in the service of adequate source memory performance.

show abstract

Section: Behavioral Performancesupporting

confidence: 94%

Section: Development Of Item and Source Memory In Childhoodmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Development Of Item and Source Memory In Childhoodmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Development Of Item and Source Memory In Childhoodmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Age-related differences in familiarity and recollection: ERP evidence from a recognition memory study in children and young adults

Czernochowski

Mecklinger

Johansson

et al. 2005

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Memory function, particularly the ability to create and retrieve richly detailed episodic representations, improves during development (Billingsley, Smith, & McAndrews, 2002;Brainerd, Holliday, & Reyna, 2004;Ghetti & Angelini, 2008;Ofen, 2012;Ofen et al, 2007). Here, we explored the influence of belief in and use of mnemonic strategies on episodic associative memory in children, adolescents, and adults.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%