“…The segregation (18,28) and chimerism (2,3,4) in the dihaploid lines reveal only part of the reasons for this situatuion. On the other hand, we achieved considerable results with non-segregating DH (8,10,33 (11,12,44,123) etc. To explain the depression of the agronomic performance of the dihaploid lines several hypothesis were raised: -inbreeding depression and residual heterozygosity which seem similar to the phetype suppression after long-term self-fertilization in many cultivated species (5,17,18,19,20,23,114,115,116,117); -cytoplasmic and/or nuclear genes modifications (17,28,51), gross chromosomal changes ( 4 2, 117) or organ ells replication (113) as a result of the in vitro culture; -DNA amplification in comparison to the source genotype (29,30,114 the yield loss recovery could be achieved after several recurrent full-sib selections (148).…”