Developmental Relationship Between Metacognitive Monitoring and Reading Comprehension

Abstract

Metacognitive processes are crucial components of self-regulatory ability. The study examined the developmental relationship between metacognitive monitoring and reading comprehension using longitudinal data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) in Germany. We used a cross-lagged panel analysis – in the framework of Structural Equation Modeling–to examine the reciprocal relationship between metacognitive monitoring (assessed as a retrospective judgement of one’s performance) and reading comprehension at three time points: grades 5, 7, and 9. For the overall group of participants, we consistently found longitudinal reciprocal effects between metacognitive monitoring and reading comprehension from grade 5 to 7 and grade 7 to 9. This implies monitoring accuracy leads to higher reading comprehension over time and vice versa. Although the accuracy of students’ judgement was positively and reciprocally related to reading comprehension, a multi-group cross-lagged panel analyses showed that excessive underestimation appeared to have a more hindering effect than excessive overestimation on later reading comprehension. However, moderate underestimation might be less detrimental than excessive overestimation. In addition to shedding light on the scientific debate on the complex developmental interplay between reading comprehension and metacognitive monitoring, theoretical and practical implications of the results are provided.

When Do Gender Differences in Academic Achievement Originate? Examining Preschoolers and Early School Children Longitudinally

“…In math, we found that across the achievement distributions, gender differences emerged as early as the fall and spring of kindergarten at the top of the achievement distribution and spread throughout the distribution during the primary schooling years. This result replicated the previous finding using another cohort of the ECLS-K: 1999, that is, the underrepresentation of girls at the top of the distribution (Cimpian et al, 2016;Edossa et al, 2022;Penner & Paret, 2008;Robinson & Lubienski, 2011). Considering effect size analyses, the present study reveals that females inconsistently overtake males at the bottom of the distributions.…”

A Critical Analysis of Reading Comprehension Tactics: Theoretical and Educational Implications

“…(Medranda, et al, (2023). On the other hand, Edossa et al, (2022) stated that students' ability to evaluate accurately was shown to be positively and reciprocally associated with understanding what they are reading, a multi-group cross-lagged panel analysis revealed that excessive underestimation had a more negative impact on subsequent reading comprehension compared to excessive overestimation. Cai et al (2023) examined the developing relationships between aim, metacognitive approach, and school accomplishment.…”