2014
DOI: 10.1080/15427609.2014.967046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Science in 2025: A Predictive Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models within the RDS perspective place a focus on the reciprocal influence between a developing individual and a multitude of dynamic contextual levels [7]. The RDS is a central component of the Process-Relation paradigm that runs in opposition to the Cartesian scientific perspective which places an emphasis on division, duality, stability and objectivism [1516] and perceives organisms as complicated (and thus divisible into parts for analysis) rather than complex [16]. In contrast, ontological and epistemological categories within the Process-Relation paradigm emphasize holism, dynamism, pluralism and subjectivism [16].…”
Section: Bioecological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Models within the RDS perspective place a focus on the reciprocal influence between a developing individual and a multitude of dynamic contextual levels [7]. The RDS is a central component of the Process-Relation paradigm that runs in opposition to the Cartesian scientific perspective which places an emphasis on division, duality, stability and objectivism [1516] and perceives organisms as complicated (and thus divisible into parts for analysis) rather than complex [16]. In contrast, ontological and epistemological categories within the Process-Relation paradigm emphasize holism, dynamism, pluralism and subjectivism [16].…”
Section: Bioecological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, ontological and epistemological categories within the Process-Relation paradigm emphasize holism, dynamism, pluralism and subjectivism [16]. In line with the Process-Relation paradigm perspective, Cartesian dichotomies are perceived as false, including the division between nature-nurture, mind-body and basic versus applied science [1516]. Overall, the Process-Relation paradigm perspective emphasizes the complexity of individual development and the importance of examining individuals holistically.…”
Section: Bioecological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To their credit, the current versions of developmental systems theories are careful to incorporate notions of agency and coaction into their theories (e.g., Lerner et al, 2014; Overton, 2014). Individuals actively construct not only the meaning of their contexts, but their transactions with it as well, resulting in the co-construction of themselves and thus their own development.…”
Section: Systems Approaches and Free Willmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In human development, that new paradigm is often referred to as relational development systems theories (RDSTs; Lerner, Agans, DeSouza, & Hershberg, 2014; Overton, 2014). Drawing upon lifespan theory, Lerner et al (2012) noted a number of theoretical tenets of this approach, including: integration of levels of organization; mutually influential individual ←→ context relations, which are the basic units of analysis; relative (e.g., limited) plasticity; the importance of intraindividual change and diversity; and an emphasis on positive human development (PHD).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this writing, these paradigmatic and metatheoretical issues are largely settled in developmental science (Lerner, Agans, DeSouza, & Hershberg, 2014;Overton & Lerner, 2014). As we will discuss, a process-relational paradigm has become preeminent within developmental science, and it provides a framework for a relational developmental systems (RDS) metatheory .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%