1966
DOI: 10.1093/brain/89.1.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Stenosis of the Cervical Spinal Canal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18 CBR, which eliminates the magni®cation e ect or radiographs, is a good alternative to measurement of the sagittal spinal canal diameter. 19 In this study, CBR signi®cantly decreased with age, and this may suggest the bony cervical spinal canal would be narrower with aging even in asymptomatic subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 CBR, which eliminates the magni®cation e ect or radiographs, is a good alternative to measurement of the sagittal spinal canal diameter. 19 In this study, CBR signi®cantly decreased with age, and this may suggest the bony cervical spinal canal would be narrower with aging even in asymptomatic subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hinck et al [14,15,16] first described congenital cervical stenosis in the subaxial region; however, to date clinically significant cervical stenosis caused by a hypoplastic C1 arch has only been described in a handful of cases worldwide [1,3,4,8,17], and usually in adult patients. The average normal sagittal canal diameter at the level of the atlas ranges between 17 and 25 mm in adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the average cord diameter ranges between 10 and 12 mm [14,18]. Clinically significant canal compromise should be suspected in patients with a canal narrower than 14 mm [19], and patients with a canal diameter of less than 10 mm are usually symptomatic [16,20]. The severity of symptoms appears to be very variable [1,3,4,8,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) This difference explains the lower incidence of symptomatic canal stenoses at the level of the atlas. Spinal cord compression should be considered a possibility if the sagittal canal diameter is less than 14 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%