2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental studies of the hippocampus and hippocampal-dependent behaviors: Insights from interdisciplinary studies and tips for new investigators

Abstract: The hippocampus is not fully developed at birth and, with respect to spatial cognition, only begins to show signs of adult-like function at three postnatal weeks in rodents. Studying the developmental period spanning roughly two to four weeks of age permits an understanding of the neural framework necessary for the emergence of spatial navigation and, quite possibly, human episodic memory. However, due to developmental factors, behavior data collection and interpretation can be severely compromised if inapprop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent studies also trace development of spontaneous alternation behavior: for example, it is not present in rats 17–19 days of age but is present at 22–24 days (Blair et al, ), and there is no difference in rates of spontaneous alternation between adolescent (28 days) and adult rats (56–70 days of age; Sakakibara et al, ). Many studies examining emergence of spontaneous alternation over development examine the behavior in conjunction with various aspects of neural development, including that of the hippocampus (see Albani, McHail, & Dumas, ). Spontaneous alternation has also been tested in older animals: for example, 18‐ and 23‐month old mice decreased alternation to chance levels at much shorter ITIs (90s and 30s, respectively) than did younger mice (180s), perhaps reflecting a decline in hippocampal memory for spontaneous alternation in aging mice (Vandesquille, Krazem, Louis, Lestage, & Béracochéa, ; see also Gold & Korol, ).…”
Section: Exploring Similarities and Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies also trace development of spontaneous alternation behavior: for example, it is not present in rats 17–19 days of age but is present at 22–24 days (Blair et al, ), and there is no difference in rates of spontaneous alternation between adolescent (28 days) and adult rats (56–70 days of age; Sakakibara et al, ). Many studies examining emergence of spontaneous alternation over development examine the behavior in conjunction with various aspects of neural development, including that of the hippocampus (see Albani, McHail, & Dumas, ). Spontaneous alternation has also been tested in older animals: for example, 18‐ and 23‐month old mice decreased alternation to chance levels at much shorter ITIs (90s and 30s, respectively) than did younger mice (180s), perhaps reflecting a decline in hippocampal memory for spontaneous alternation in aging mice (Vandesquille, Krazem, Louis, Lestage, & Béracochéa, ; see also Gold & Korol, ).…”
Section: Exploring Similarities and Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results reveal that immune activation can produce alterations in cognitive function that are distinct across ages (Henry et al, ; Liu et al, ). Neuroscientists are only beginning to understand how the maturation of certain structures in the brain allows for the emergence of specific behaviors throughout development (Albani et al, ). Similarly, immunologists understand very little about the developing peripheral and central immune systems (Sharma et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6A). Thus, the Y maze test may not be suitable for assessing cognitive abilities in rodents prior to P20 (Albani et al, 2014). Nevertheless, DS mice covered significantly longer distances during exploration (Fig.…”
Section: Behavioral Deficits In Ds Mice During the Febrile Worseningmentioning
confidence: 99%