2002
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2002.0125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developments in a methodology for the design of engineered invert traps in combined sewer systems

Abstract: Sediments within sewers can have a significant effect on the operation of the sewer system and on the surrounding natural and urban environment. One possible method for the management of sewer sediments is the use of slotted invert traps. Although invert traps can be used to selectively trap only inorganic bedload material, little is known with regard to the design of these structures. This paper presents results from a laboratory investigation comparing the trapping performance of three slot size configuratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where, ws is fall velocity (m/s), * d is dimensionless particle diameter, g is gravity acceleration (m/s 2 ), ν is kinematic viscosity of water (m 2 /s) and d is particle diameter (sieve diameter, m). For this purpose, the input data (particle size, specific gravity, kinematic viscosity of water) of Buxton et al (2002) was fitted into these four equations of particle fall velocity and the average percent error between calculated and experimentally measured value was estimated for each equation. It was observed that all four empirical equations underpredicting the fall velocity values as compared with the experimentally measured values of Buxton et al (2002).…”
Section: Specific Gravity (G) and Density Of Sewer Solid (ρSs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where, ws is fall velocity (m/s), * d is dimensionless particle diameter, g is gravity acceleration (m/s 2 ), ν is kinematic viscosity of water (m 2 /s) and d is particle diameter (sieve diameter, m). For this purpose, the input data (particle size, specific gravity, kinematic viscosity of water) of Buxton et al (2002) was fitted into these four equations of particle fall velocity and the average percent error between calculated and experimentally measured value was estimated for each equation. It was observed that all four empirical equations underpredicting the fall velocity values as compared with the experimentally measured values of Buxton et al (2002).…”
Section: Specific Gravity (G) and Density Of Sewer Solid (ρSs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deposition of particles reduces the depth of flow, which will reduce the design discharge capacity of sewers and open drains. Due to this, the water spills out of the open drains and sewers and creates flooding and waterlogging problems, resulting in environmental nuisance and an impediment to the traffic movement (Buxton et al, 2002;Kaushal, 2016a, 2016b;Kaushal, 2008a, 2008b). The deposited sediment particles will experience no force of orientation during sedimentation in viscous flow regime, but at high Reynold numbers particle orientation will occur chaotically (Corn, 1963;Gans, 1928).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, CFD studies with GPT related devices, such as sewage structures, storage/ retention tanks and hydrodynamic separators have provided valuable insights into flow patterns, pollutant mixing and sediment transport behaviour (Stovin et al 1999(Stovin et al , 2000(Stovin et al , 2002Harwood 2002;Faram and Harwood 2003). Two-dimensional CFD models have been used to study global flow structures and sediment retention in invert traps (Buxton et al 2002;Gupta et al 2005). were allowed to operate for a minimum of one hour prior to taking measurements, after which the water free surface in the GPT and also downstream was observed to be smooth and free of any obvious wave-like disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is confirmed by carrying out the simulation for various cases involving simulation of the centrally placed slot with both covers at the same height, a simulation using a raised downstream cover, a simulation with a slot situated at the downstream edge of the trap, and a simulation with the slot situated at the upstream edge of the trap. Buxton et al (2002) proposed a 2-D computational model to compare the results of sediment retention efficiency of the channel with an invert trap with that of laboratory results. A renormalization group (RNG) j-e model was used in the model, and the performance of three slotted rectangular configurations with slots of 90 mm, 45 mm, and 22.5 mm was predicted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%