2017
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1268999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developments in multiple breath washout testing in children with cystic fibrosis

Abstract: Standardization of LCI is part of an ongoing collaborative, multicenter process. This review describes the background to LCI, discusses technical issues and limitations and provides examples of its utility in clinical and research contexts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…18 LCI 2.5 detects small changes in CF lungs, in particular in peripheral airways, and so is considered a sensitive measure of lung disease severity. [18][19][20] Despite research into reliability, validity and responsiveness of LCI 2.5 as a longer term OM, and support of LCI for clinical trial use by the European CF Society Clinical Trial Network Standardisation Committee, 14 it is not clear whether LCI 2.5 is useful in determining differences over a short time, for example, single-ACT sessions. 14 21 22 In particular, as LCI 2.5 is altered by airway obstruction, the movement of secretions which occurs during ACT, alongside altered ventilation of lung segments, could result either in increased or decreased LCI 2.5 ; both directions of change have been reported in previous small studies measuring ACT effect.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 LCI 2.5 detects small changes in CF lungs, in particular in peripheral airways, and so is considered a sensitive measure of lung disease severity. [18][19][20] Despite research into reliability, validity and responsiveness of LCI 2.5 as a longer term OM, and support of LCI for clinical trial use by the European CF Society Clinical Trial Network Standardisation Committee, 14 it is not clear whether LCI 2.5 is useful in determining differences over a short time, for example, single-ACT sessions. 14 21 22 In particular, as LCI 2.5 is altered by airway obstruction, the movement of secretions which occurs during ACT, alongside altered ventilation of lung segments, could result either in increased or decreased LCI 2.5 ; both directions of change have been reported in previous small studies measuring ACT effect.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 In comparison to spirometry parameters, it's a more sensitive indicator of pulmonary disease in young patients and it starts to be increased at an early age. [25][26][27] In prospective studies, it becomes abnormal before other lung function markers. 19,24 According to Kraemer et al, 19 LCI derived from MBNW was the strongest indicator of disease progression, followed by MEF 50 and FRC pleth .…”
Section: Lung Function In Patients With Different Genotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple breath washout (MBW), which has been shown to be sensitive to early‐onset disease progression, has therefore gained considerable interest in the CF community. Lung clearance index (LCI 2.5 ), a parameter derived from the MBW test, is sensitive to early lung disease, being abnormal in infants, young children and older patients with apparently well‐preserved spirometry . MBW‐derived indices are increasingly being explored in both clinical and research settings, trying to define the clinical utility of the LCI 2.5 in the monitoring of CF lung disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lung clearance index (LCI 2.5 ), a parameter derived from the MBW test, is sensitive to early lung disease, being abnormal in infants, young children and older patients with apparently well-preserved spirometry. 8 MBW-derived indices are increasingly being explored in both clinical and research settings, trying to define the clinical utility of the LCI 2.5 in the monitoring of CF lung disease. Using MBWderived indices, any sign of ventilation inhomogeneity in subjects without severe airflow obstruction and with a normal response to exercise could alert the CF team to recognize early lung disease and potential exercise limiting factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%