2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-018-6248-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developments in radioanalytics: from Geiger counters to single atom counting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ions and electrons are attracted to the suitable electrodes, giving rise to a current flow. The latter is then converted into electric signals, which are finally measured as the amount of radiation [112]. The GM detectors and ionization chambers are capable of detecting alpha, beta, and gamma radiation [113].…”
Section: Radiation Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ions and electrons are attracted to the suitable electrodes, giving rise to a current flow. The latter is then converted into electric signals, which are finally measured as the amount of radiation [112]. The GM detectors and ionization chambers are capable of detecting alpha, beta, and gamma radiation [113].…”
Section: Radiation Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our most commonly used radiation detectors include GM (Geiger-Muller) counters, semiconductor devices, and scintillators. However, GM tubes have a large volume, high operating voltage, lower accuracy, and poor linear energy response [1] . Semiconductor detectors have lower detection efficiency and poor energy response [2] [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, AMS has the highest detection sensitivity, which can be lower than 1 × 10 −15 . 4 However, both of these methods have issues such as complex operation, off-line measurement, high cost, and large instrument size, which cannot provide sufficient assurance for the increasing demand for carbon-14 detection. 5 As early as 1977, using laser spectroscopy to deduce 14C/C has been proposed, which leverages the measurement of 14 CO 2 spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional methods for detecting 14 C/C primarily involve accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) and liquid scintillation counting (LSC). Among these, AMS has the highest detection sensitivity, which can be lower than 1 × 10 −15 4 . However, both of these methods have issues such as complex operation, off‐line measurement, high cost, and large instrument size, which cannot provide sufficient assurance for the increasing demand for carbon‐14 detection 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%