Developments of Transactive Memory Systems and Collective Mind in Virtual Teams

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. In this study, we examine the developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind and their influence on performance in virtual teams. Although one of the oft-cited benefits of the virtual team is the ability of its members to contribute diverse knowledge and expertise, the question of how virtual team members can bring their respective knowledge and expertise to solve the problems they face has been largely ignored in the past research on virtual teams. Building on an emergingbody of socio-cognitive literature, we argue that transactive memory systems and the collective mind are two important variables that explain team performance. We tested our hypotheses with a longitudinal data set that was collected from 38 virtual teams of graduate management students from six universities in four countries over eight weeks. The results suggest that the influence of team members' early communication volume on team performance decreases as teams develop transactive memory systems and a collective mind. The results further suggest that the development of a collective mind represents a high-order learning in team settings.

Sex differences in the effects of visual contact and eye contact in negotiations

“…In order to do so, we adapted an existing scale that included the following items "negotiating parties' share a common viewpoint which also comprises individual points of view" and "negotiating parties took other's interests into account in developing a point of view" (Yoo & Kanawattanachai, 2001). …”

Considering Diversity: Multivoicedness in International Academic Collaboration

“…Engeström, Engeström, & Kärkäinen, 1995;Granovetter, 1973;Gutiérrez, Baquedano-López, & Tejeda, 1999;Homan, 2001;Ryan, Cott, & Robertson, 1997;Wenger, 1998). What is also frequently emphasized is that the use of multiple different lenses to approach an object of investigation allows groups to deal with complex cases and problems (Derry, Adams DuRussel, & O'Donnell, 1998;Yoo & Kanawattanachai, 2001). Although diversity is argued to be a potential resource for new understandings, a general argument in many studies on collaboration is that diversity is also that which constrains mutual understanding and learning from each other (e.g.…”

Internationalization at a Distance

“…Early studies focused on the effectiveness of online teaching (compared with more traditional classroom-based teaching), the changing roles of instructors, interaction patterns in the online environment (Arbaugh, 2000;Berger, 1999), and the degree of transferability of various types of classroom activities to the online context (Bigelow, 1999;Meisel & Marx, 1999). Online collaboration was another theme of early online management education studies and was considered in the context of virtual global teams, groups, or dyads with regard to building trust, distinguishing between task and goal orientations of participants, understanding communication patterns (Jarvenpaa, Knoll, & Leidner, 1998;Jarvenpaa & Leidner, 1999), developing higher-level cognitive skills (Yoo & Kanawattanachai, 2001), and solving customer-service issues (Newman & Hermans, 2008).…”