2019
DOI: 10.1088/2399-6528/ab5575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developments towards Bragg edge imaging on the IMAT beamline at the ISIS Pulsed Neutron and Muon Source: BEAn software

Abstract: The BEAn (Bragg Edge Analysis) software has been developed as a toolkit for analysis of Bragg edges and strain maps from data obtained at the time-of-flight imaging instrument IMAT or other compatible instruments. The code is built primarily using Python 3 and the Qt framework, and includes tools useful for neutron imaging such as principal component analysis. This paper introduces BEAn and its features, briefly discuses the scientific concepts behind them, and concludes with planned future work on the code.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in Fig. 2 C it can be observed that for the photon event-mode profile the (200) Bragg-edge shows transmission values greater than that of the (211) Bragg-edge as compared to in the neutron event-mode profile, with the neutron event-mode profile consistent with alpha-iron profiles measured using neutron counting detectors reported in the literature 26 , 27 . This can be explained by the lower S/N of the photon event-mode data as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Event-mode Imaging Setup For Neutronssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, in Fig. 2 C it can be observed that for the photon event-mode profile the (200) Bragg-edge shows transmission values greater than that of the (211) Bragg-edge as compared to in the neutron event-mode profile, with the neutron event-mode profile consistent with alpha-iron profiles measured using neutron counting detectors reported in the literature 26 , 27 . This can be explained by the lower S/N of the photon event-mode data as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Event-mode Imaging Setup For Neutronssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Scaling of the open beam datasets is preferable for a more accurate flat-field correction as all datasets may not have the same number of triggers. The methods used for overlap and scaling correction are the same as those already used on IMAT, for which a detailed description is available in [44]. This initial pre-processing stage is applied to all radiographs, which are thereafter saved as unsigned 16-bit TIFF images.…”
Section: Data Processing Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The open beam and sample beam data after overlap correction were scaled to the same number of incident neutrons. This was achieved by reducing the open beam data down to the same number of counts using a multiplication factor as described in 52 . Once scaled the sample stack was normalised by dividing pixel by pixel by the open beam data to calculate a stack of transmission images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stack of 2711 radiographies were collected for each test, with each radiography belonging to a specific wavelength. The data was corrected prior to Bragg-dip analysis following a method used by the BEAn software 52 . Six MCP readouts (shutter positions) were chosen to reduce the event overlap 53 .…”
Section: Calculation Of Sample Transmission Using Time-of-flight Datamentioning
confidence: 99%