2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deviant word order in Swedish poetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This seems to be especially true of rules involving word order (see e.g. O'Neil 2001, Eythórsson 2009, Fabb 2010, Thoms 2010, Magnusson Petzell & Hellberg 2014, Häussler et al 2019. Linguists disagree as to whether the rules of poetic language should be seen as an extension of the 'standard' rules of the relevant language, or at least as rules permitted by UG in some languages (see e.g.…”
Section: Summary Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems to be especially true of rules involving word order (see e.g. O'Neil 2001, Eythórsson 2009, Fabb 2010, Thoms 2010, Magnusson Petzell & Hellberg 2014, Häussler et al 2019. Linguists disagree as to whether the rules of poetic language should be seen as an extension of the 'standard' rules of the relevant language, or at least as rules permitted by UG in some languages (see e.g.…”
Section: Summary Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of dialect as well as that of a standard variety are problematic. In Sweden, a spoken standard variety is an abstract notion, or ideal, that is rarely found in real conversations, but rather used by announcers on TV and in the performing arts (Thelander 1996, Teleman 2003, Magnusson Petzell & Nilsson 2015). Standard Swedish has been described as the opposite of dialects and sociolects (Josephson 2004), and does not reveal the geographical or social background of a speaker (Teleman 2003).…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%