1977
DOI: 10.1122/1.549445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deviation of Velocity Gradient Profiles from the “Gap Loading” and “Surface Loading” Limits in Dynamic Simple Shear Experiments

Abstract: The shear-wave field generated in a linear viscoelastic medium confined between parallel plates (one fixed, the other oscillating sinusoidally in its own plane) has been evaluated and presented in a graphical form convenient for determination of the role of wave propagation effects in dynamic rheological measurements. The transition from closely spaced planes (“gap loading”) to the freely propagating plane wave (“surface loading”) limit is examined; the importance of deviations in magnitude and phase of the gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For oscillatory experiments, gap loading conditions may be confirmed by ensuring that the shear wavelength (k s ) is at least greater than 10 h, where h is the geometry gap. The shear wavelength can be estimated as [28] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For oscillatory experiments, gap loading conditions may be confirmed by ensuring that the shear wavelength (k s ) is at least greater than 10 h, where h is the geometry gap. The shear wavelength can be estimated as [28] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value is significantly above the value of 62.7 • ± 1.0 • obtained using an SMT rheometer (ARES-G2 in the present study) and displays a high degree of uncertainty reflective of the large deviation of the positions of the GP roots. The deviation in the root positions (±6.9 • ) should alert the experimentalist to inadequacies in the GP acquisition procedure, which may be caused by several experimental issues, for example; sample mutation Mours andWinter, 1994); sample inertia (Schrag, 1977); evaporation of the sample (Hellström et al, 2015); under/over/asymmetric loading (Ewoldt et al, 2015) or instrument inertia. In the present study, the effect of inaccurate instrument inertia calibration has been isolated by careful experimental design and data verification (see Sec.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gelatin samples were loaded onto the rheometer at 34 • C before the upper geometry was lowered into place and the test commenced at which point the temperature was quenched to the test temperature. To satisfy the gap loading condition (Schrag, 1977), which ensures that the velocity gradient across the geometry gap is uniform thus confirming negligible sample inertia effects, a shearing gap of 150 µm was used. Inertia correction studies were completed using 2.5 wt.…”
Section: Cmt Rheometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oscillatory shear rheology of water was measured with an apparent G' > G" suggesting solid-like behaviour. This low viscosity fluid was subsequently shown to be outside of the measurable range for oscillatory shear rheology in parallel plates as a standing wave can be set up in low viscosity fluids which interferes with the result (Schrag, 1977). Amplitude sweeps were completed to determine a stress value which was within the linear viscoelastic region (LVR) across the range of frequencies measured.…”
Section: Oscillatory Shear Rheologymentioning
confidence: 99%