1975
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.39.684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deviations form Matthiessen's Rule in Dilute Aluminum Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…% for furnace-cooled A1-0.1 at. % Ag also agrees well with 11.2 nQ m/at.% obtained for furnace-cooled AI-0.1 at.% Ag by Kawata and Kino (1975), who analysed the solute concentration with atomic absorption spectroscopy. Therefore, we can attribute the observed enhancement of ps to clusters in these alloys.…”
Section: Ps On Furnace-cooled and Air-quenched Foilssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…% for furnace-cooled A1-0.1 at. % Ag also agrees well with 11.2 nQ m/at.% obtained for furnace-cooled AI-0.1 at.% Ag by Kawata and Kino (1975), who analysed the solute concentration with atomic absorption spectroscopy. Therefore, we can attribute the observed enhancement of ps to clusters in these alloys.…”
Section: Ps On Furnace-cooled and Air-quenched Foilssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The residual resistivity p o (4.2K) of the currently investigated AI-Si alloys is proportional to the solute concentration, indicating that the Si atoms are homogeneously distributed. The residual resistivity per atomic per cent is about 0.580 X Q cm at.%-', which is in excellent agreement with the calculated value of 0.580 x 51 cm at.%-' (Fukai 1969), while it differs from the values of 0.650 x Q cm at.%-l obtained by Kawata and Kino (1975), 0.720 X Q cm at.%-' obtained by Fickett (1971) and 0.670 X 52 cm at.%-' obtained by Takamura (1965). The probable reasons for the differences between the present and the previous values are believed to be the existing impurities in silicon and the metallurgical preparation of the samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…2) is not linear (Pn = 3.81 x 10 6 c0.74). Deviation of the residual resistivity on admixture concentration dependence from linearity was observed also by other investigators [6]. The DMR as a function of temperature (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%